Eclipse & CDT Problem

2003-04-30 Thread "Félix"
Hello I am not sure if this is the correct list to send this, but it is the only in debian that has questions about Eclipse. I have a problem when I try to install the cdt plugins. I think I get the correct ones (cdt for eclipse 2.1) but when I run Eclipse, the updater says it needs some packag

Re: Swing and other free GUIs (KDE?)

2003-04-30 Thread Alexander Hvostov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dalibor Topic wrote: > In my opinion, a pure java, liberally licensed, free software, swing > implementation would be preferable to native-toolkit based swing > implementations. The hypothetical [1] native speed advantage is not as > important as cros

Re: dom4j

2003-04-30 Thread Peter Kahle
(originally sent privately, sent to list for posterity) xml-apis.jar was split out of the xalan.jar at some point. On my sid system with libxalan2-java 2.4.1.1 installed, xml-apis.jar is included. P On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 04:53, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: > Hello. > > I've got a trouble with ht

dom4j

2003-04-30 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
Hello. I've got a trouble with http://www.dom4j.org/ since it ships some (actually, many) "standard" xml jars with it, even it will be nice to use debian's ones. Another trouble is that classes in debs seems to be packed in another way than it was intended by upstreams: first thing I stumbled on i

Re: Sponsor for a bootstrapping Java++ compiler

2003-04-30 Thread Daniel Bonniot
To achieve this I use the "deb-makepkg" script below. Thanks a lot, I will look at this. Shouldn't this advertised publicly, and a package made for it? Or could it be integrated to cvs-buildpackage and/or dpkg-buildpackage, as appropriate? It would probably benefit the community, and help to h

Re: Sponsor for a bootstrapping Java++ compiler

2003-04-30 Thread Daniel Bonniot
Hi, Thanks for your answer, I had given up hope! The package cannot yet be built entirely with free tools (it needs a JVM at build time to run the bootstrap compiler). It works with kaffe from CVS, but not 1.0.7, so I hope there will be a new release soon. Have you file a wishlist bug against

Re: Sponsor for a bootstrapping Java++ compiler

2003-04-30 Thread Egon
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 10:11, Jeremy Lainé wrote: > > AFAIK, this is not OK. Though I used to do it myself too. The > > correct way, I believe is to make a tar.gz file, like the one which > > is online, and build the Debian package from that. > > To achieve this I use the "deb-makepkg" script b

Re: Sponsor for a bootstrapping Java++ compiler

2003-04-30 Thread Jeremy Lainé
> AFAIK, this is not OK. Though I used to do it myself too. The > correct way, I believe is to make a tar.gz file, like the one which > is online, and build the Debian package from that. To achieve this I use the "deb-makepkg" script below. You need to adjust the BUILDIR to wherever you build your

Re: Sponsor for a bootstrapping Java++ compiler

2003-04-30 Thread Egon
On Saturday 19 April 2003 19:31, Daniel Bonniot wrote: > I am the upstream author of the Nice language, which is an extension of > Java with many advanced features. It is released under the GPL. > Homepage: http://nice.sourceforge.net Looks nice ;) Though I have to say that what it tries to do doe