Hallo Bear,
* Bear Giles wrote:
I don't think this rises to the level of a 'bug,' but maybe
somebody here knows the answer. Why does eclipse depend on motif
instead of motif | lesstif?
The eclipse.org swt FAQ states, that lestiff does not implement
everything what swt needs:
--8-:-
Wim Bertels wrote:
Houdi,
i use statcvs 20030713-2 (unstable apparently),
i get the following error while trying to run statcvs
damian:/tmp# statcvs logfile r2g2/
StatCvs - CVS statistics generation
java.awt.AWTError: native layer initialization failed
at java.awt.Font.init (Font.java:48)
Hi,
There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
that keep kaffe from reentering testing.
The details are at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kaffe
One of the bugs (the manpage location) seems trivial, and a patch is
attached. Is there a reason why it
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
Hi,
There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
that keep kaffe from reentering testing.
The details are at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kaffe
Why didn't you cc the maintainer of kaffe?
--
To
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:20:39 +0100
Daniel Bonniot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Given that a release it coming, it would be really nice if these
issues could be solved. There are at the moment 17 packages prevented
to enter testing because of kaffe. Or looking at it more positively,
Two more important bugs (but I did not file it on the bts):
- problem with xml entities (bug introduced by gnujaxp): resolved with
1.1.2
- java.util.TimeZone.SHORT does not exists: resolved with 1.1.2
These should actually be only one (minor/normal level) bug in Debian's
BTS: Upstream
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:14:34PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
that keep kaffe from reentering testing. The details are at
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kaffe
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
[alternate name for j2se-package]
Maybe most of people like mpkg-xx name. I suggest 'mpkg-j2se'. It's
more intuitive.
Okay. I'm overruled. The script will be renamed into 'mpkg-j2se'. Should
the package also be called 'mpkg-j2se'?
Another question:
8 matches
Mail list logo