Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)

"Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > I like the new changelog. I just wanted to comment on that given > current practices I see. [...] > The general practise I see is to include the information what actually > got changed - first. Because bug no. is non-informative, whil

Re: From contrib to main

Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> I did prepare a web page to try to put as more debian-java packages >> in main. > > Good work! Thanks a lot! > > Could you turn it into a Wiki page so you don't have to merge all > comments? You can e.g. create a new MovingJavaT

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:45:28PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > > >> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > >> > What is the meaning of these lines in the cha

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)

Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> > What is the meaning of these lines in the changelog? >> >> Ludovic Rousseau suggests me to add the title of the bug. >> >> I'v

Re: tomcat-connectors progress?

Patrick Herzig wrote: It mentions the package tomcat-connectors, which I guess is intended to replace libapache2-mod-webapp. Yes, this was the intention. However, I was told that mod_webapp is deprecated so I decided to package mod_jk for Apache 1.3 and mod_jk2 for Apache 2.x separately. Is the

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)

Hi! I like the new changelog. I just wanted to comment on that given current practices I see. W liście z sob, 10-01-2004, godz. 05:41, Arnaud Vandyck pisze: > kaffe (1:1.1.3-0.1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Non Maintainer Upload. > * New upstream release (Closes: #215095). exactly: informat

Re: tomcat-connectors progress?

Hello, I recently set up a test machine (testing/unstable) with Apache2 and Tomcat and was a bit puzzled because I couldn't find the libapache2-mod-webapp in the archive anymore. After some searching I came across this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2003/debian-java-200311/msg00088.h

Re: mod_jk and mod_jk2

Alessandro Polverini wrote: I'm using his package right now (why is it not in the debian archive btw?), but it's only for apache 1.3.29, while I need mod_jk2 for apache2. I have rebuild and uploaded the mod_jk package now. It should be in the Debian archives in a couple of days. Any help on how

Re: From contrib to main

Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I did prepare a web page to try to put as more debian-java packages in main. Good work! Thanks a lot! Could you turn it into a Wiki page so you don't have to merge all comments? You can e.g. create a new MovingJavaToMain page at http://wiki.debian.net/. Stefan -- To UNSU

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:22:26PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > > >> >* New upstream release (Closes: #215095). > >> > - Closes: #225702 > >> >Already explained

From contrib to main

Hi all, I did prepare a web page to try to put as more debian-java packages in main. http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/contrib.html Introduction One of the problem of java packages in Debian is they need a non-free JVM to be build or to run. The aim of this page is to bring the more

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)

Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:22:26PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> >* New upstream release (Closes: #215095). >> > - Closes: #225702 >> >Already explained in the bug report, also, see kaffe changelog: >> >2003-08-28 Guilhem L