Re: Current status of your swt-gtk package

On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:55:07PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > > Michael said: > >The second option was done long ago, originally for Fedora. > > > It would be the best if Eclipse.org just moved up to tomcat5. The more > debian's eclipse deviates from upsteam the more of a pain it is on both the >

Bug#334628: FTBFS: Invalid ANT_HOME directory

Package: java-snmp Version: 1.4-2 Severity: serious java-snmp fails to build: > for dir in debian/patches ; do \ > rm -f $dir/*.log ; \ > done > You must specify a valid ANT_HOME directory! > make: *** [ant-sanity-check] Error 1 -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Current status of your swt-gtk package

Michael said: The second option was done long ago, originally for Fedora. It would be the best if Eclipse.org just moved up to tomcat5. The more debian's eclipse deviates from upsteam the more of a pain it is on both the debian maintainer and on upstream. Off topic but just to throw this