Re: Java policy draft

2006-03-03 Thread Jan Schulz
Hi You, Sanghyeon Seo wrote: I just finished reading http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Draft Me too. :-) Some comments: [Virtual packages] Please define, what it means to provide a virtual package. From the context of the document, the only *garantee* this provides makes is "you can develop java

Re: Java policy draft

2006-03-03 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley writes: > Re debugging info -- I put this patch into ecj on Fedora: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-January/msg00086.html > > This patch means that no matter what broken debug options are in Ant > scripts, every Java program in an RPM has full de

Re: Java policy draft

2006-03-03 Thread Andrew Haley
Re debugging info -- I put this patch into ecj on Fedora: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-January/msg00086.html This patch means that no matter what broken debug options are in Ant scripts, every Java program in an RPM has full debuginfo. Essentially, this turns a rule

Java policy draft

2006-03-03 Thread Sanghyeon Seo
I just finished reading http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Draft In virtual package names, "sdk" is used instead of "jdk". They should be consistent. Seo Sanghyeon