doc-base policy proposal for API Javadoc (was Re: Java policy draft)

2006-03-09 Thread Barry Hawkins
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:28:36PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: [...] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > > Just my 5 cents: the policy about javadoc doesn't say where the javadoc > > should be registered in doc-base. I would suggest something like > > Programming/Java, in order to avoid have link

pkg-java svn layout (was: Re: r1980 - /)

2006-03-09 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Author: avdyk > Date: 2006-03-09 22:25:05 + (Thu, 09 Mar 2006) > New Revision: 1980 > > Added: >packages/ > Log: > new directory where to put the packages I made some tests with svn-buildpackage and I really l

Re: Java policy draft; a road map proposal...

2006-03-09 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Hi, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Pierre Métras wrote: > >>>Hello list, > > > Salut Pierre, > > >>>Having read the new Draft page, read again another time many pages on the >>>wiki, in the Java FAQ and in the Java Policy, the java-common bugs, I still >>>stay with the feeling that there is no cle

Re: Packaging Maven 2 - shipping binaries for bootstrapping.

2006-03-09 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wolfgang Baer wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > Philipp Meier wrote: > [..] > >>My worry is still wheter to ship binaries in the source to bootsrap a >>first maven 2 version in debian or going to make ant files for the first >>version's dependencies. > > I d

Re: Java policy draft; a road map proposal...

2006-03-09 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre Métras wrote: > Hello list, Salut Pierre, > Having read the new Draft page, read again another time many pages on the > wiki, in the Java FAQ and in the Java Policy, the java-common bugs, I still > stay with the feeling that there is no clea

Re: Java policy draft

2006-03-09 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > >>>I just finished reading http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Draft >> >>Me too. :-) > > Yep. > > Just my 5 cents: the policy about javadoc doesn't say where the javadoc > should be registered in doc-base. I would suggest s

Re: [Debian-Java] Bits from the FOSDEM

2006-03-09 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Hi all, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > > - java libraries can go to main if they can be built with free VM; > If the library builds with a free VM and only runs partially under a free > VM, the question should be "is there a program ready to go to main, > depending on this library, an

Re: Packaging Maven 2 - shipping binaries for bootstrapping.

2006-03-09 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Hi Philipp, Philipp Meier wrote: [..] > > My worry is still wheter to ship binaries in the source to bootsrap a > first maven 2 version in debian or going to make ant files for the first > version's dependencies. I don't know anything about maven but we need to go with the ant files as otherwise

Re: Packaging Maven 2 - shipping binaries for bootstrapping.

2006-03-09 Thread Philipp Meier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Trygve Laugstøl schrieb: > I tried to package Maven 2 last summer and you seem to have gotten as > far as I was back then so let me give you a small braindump. > > You seem to have found some of the depdencies that Maven needs to build > itself, but

Re: Bits from the FOSDEM

2006-03-09 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Florian Weimer] > debian/rules actually compiles the source code, and does not simply > copy JAR files around (or something like that). Right. I read your statement that the code should be compiled with the free java compiler and libraries, and not with SUNs compiler and libraries, and wondered

Re: [Debian-Java] Bits from the FOSDEM

2006-03-09 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hi, >> > - java libraries can go to main if they can be built with free VM; > > Does this also mean that it is no longer required that a library be > runnable from a free VM? My libbcprov-java builds just fine, but the > test cases fail under all free VMs. I would also second the fact that, if the