Re: libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

Hello Eric, On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:47:48PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote: Hi, looking at the below email, I've done some statistics (raw data attached): contrib/devel 3 contrib/libs 14 contrib/text 1 contrib/utils 1 devel 20 graphics 1 libdevel 2 libs 206 misc 1

Bug#212863: The high income!

Hello jobseeker, We are present new work. We are glad to invite you to our company. Exelent salary. Availible Vacancy - Financial customer Please send you resume on this email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info! Important: your Job Verification Number is: 224202361 Sincerely, Robert Colonais

eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

reassign 432541 gcj-4.2 retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins merge 432539 432541 thanks Hi, after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that the FTBFS occurs with gcj-4.2, and is not related to ecj. Indeed, using the

Bug#448286: java-common: [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Almost all Java libraries should be in section libs.

Package: java-common Version: 0.26 Severity: wishlist Hello, in section 2.4 Java libraries it should be specified that packages containing such libraries should belong to the 'libs' section and not to the 'devel' section. As Java libraries, to the difference of C libraries, are at the same

Re: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

reassign 432541 eclipse-cdt clone 432541 -1 reassign -1 gcj-4.3 thanks eclipse-cdt still FTBFS, so keeping a duplicate there. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]