Re: OpenJDK for lenny

Florian Weimer wrote: * Matthias Klose: So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps, realizing that not all of them probably can be realized. Is there upstream security support for OpenJDK 6? I'm askin

Re: OpenJDK for lenny

* Matthias Klose: > So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would > benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps, > realizing that not all of them probably can be realized. Is there upstream security support for OpenJDK 6? I'm asking because the DLJ stuff us

Review wanted on a package

Hello, I'm trying to package protobuf (http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/). The source package will generate C++, Python and Java bindings. Since I'm not knowledgeable with Java, and even less with Java packaging, could someone please look over the Java bits? The git tree for the packaging is at