Matthias Klose wrote:
proposing a freeze exception for cacao-oj6 for testing. cacao-oj6 is a
copy of the openjdk-6 package with the cacao sources
included. Compared to openjdk-6 on architectures without the Hotspot
JIT support, cacao-oj6 (including a JIT) is a much faster JVM on the
Torsten Werner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/icedtea-gcjwebplugin_1.0+dak1-1.html
There was some delay because of a bug in dak. I do not know if the
release team is willing to unblock the package.
unblocked
* Luk Claes:
Matthias Klose wrote:
proposing a freeze exception for cacao-oj6 for testing. cacao-oj6 is a
copy of the openjdk-6 package with the cacao sources
included. Compared to openjdk-6 on architectures without the Hotspot
JIT support, cacao-oj6 (including a JIT) is a much faster JVM on
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
A security update for the OpenJDK 6 source base will require more than
60 hours of armel build time, and more than two weeks[1] on sparc for
openjdk-6 alone (don't know cocoa-oj6 yet).
The fastjar changes are aimed to decrease
Florian Weimer writes:
* Luk Claes:
Matthias Klose wrote:
proposing a freeze exception for cacao-oj6 for testing. cacao-oj6 is a
copy of the openjdk-6 package with the cacao sources
included. Compared to openjdk-6 on architectures without the Hotspot
JIT support, cacao-oj6 (including
Bastian Blank writes:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
A security update for the OpenJDK 6 source base will require more than
60 hours of armel build time, and more than two weeks[1] on sparc for
openjdk-6 alone (don't know cocoa-oj6 yet).
The fastjar
6 matches
Mail list logo
