On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Max Bowsherm...@f2s.com wrote:
...
It would be extremely nice too if all wrap language would adopt the
same convention. So that toolkit such as VTK/ITK/GDCM wrapping their
interface into multiple languages (namely: Tcl, Python, Java, C#)
could simply decide:
On Sat Jul 25 11:28, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Max Bowsherm...@f2s.com wrote:
...
It would be extremely nice too if all wrap language would adopt the
same convention. So that toolkit such as VTK/ITK/GDCM wrapping their
interface into multiple languages
On 25.07.2009 05:47, Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Sat Jul 25 11:28, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Max Bowsherm...@f2s.com wrote:
...
It would be extremely nice too if all wrap language would adopt the
same convention. So that toolkit such as VTK/ITK/GDCM wrapping
On Sat Jul 25 06:27, Matthias Klose wrote:
Wrong. It's already done, including a version in the file name and having
a symlink to an unversioned jar. It should be possible to do something
similiar with jni bindings.
That's not a complete solution. 1. it's not reflected in package names,
2.
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 11:28 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Max Bowsherm...@f2s.com wrote:
...
It would be extremely nice too if all wrap language would adopt the
same convention. So that toolkit such as VTK/ITK/GDCM wrapping their
interface into multiple
5 matches
Mail list logo
