ITP: libjbcrypt-java -- Java implementation of OpenBSD's Blowfish hashing

2010-04-19 Thread Per Andersson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Per Andersson * Package name: libjbcrypt-java Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Damien Miller * URL : http://www.mindrot.org/projects/jBCrypt/ * License : ISC/BSD Programming Lang: Java Description : libjbcrypt-java

Re: Maintaining libjgrapht-java

2010-04-19 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi > I'm trying to understand which is the current maintainance status for > libjgrapht-java. This package got added and removed some times into and= > from different distributions with different names, so it's not entirely= > clear to me who is caring after it at the moment. >=20 I think it wa

Maintaining libjgrapht-java

2010-04-19 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi all. I'm trying to understand which is the current maintainance status for libjgrapht-java. This package got added and removed some times into and from different distributions with different names, so it's not entirely clear to me who is caring after it at the moment. Steffen Moeller wrote me

Re: [DebianGIS] JAI-core acceptable in non-free?

2010-04-19 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Not just Openjump, Almost any java gis program relies on jai (geotools library, kosmo gis, gvSig, openjump, udig, diva gis, ...). I have not yet done a lot of research (and my knowledge of java is too small to do it quickly) but it might be possible to separate the core functionality to main and ot

Re: [DebianGIS] JAI-core acceptable in non-free?

2010-04-19 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > I have been trying to find out whether jai-core (java advanced > imaging) is acceptable for distribution in 'non-free'. > It's a library that is used by (among others) a large number of open > source java GIS applications. > Joh

RFS: acgvision-agent [2nd try]

2010-04-19 Thread Rémi Debay
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "acgvision-agent". * Package name : acgvision-agent Version : 5.1.4-1 Upstream Author : Rémi Debay remi.de...@acgcenter.com * URL : https://launchpad.net/acgvision * License : Gnu GPLV2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: acgvi

JAI-core acceptable in non-free?

2010-04-19 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I have been trying to find out whether jai-core (java advanced imaging) is acceptable for distribution in 'non-free'. It's a library that is used by (among others) a large number of open source java GIS applications. >From the website: The source code for the jai-core project is licensed under th

Re: Policy Changes: Executable jars and removal of Compiler section.

2010-04-19 Thread Torsten Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Niels Thykier schrieb: > I will upload java-common later today. Feel free to update the FAQ, too. Cheers, Torsten -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARE

Bug#576632: marked as done (Description of default-jre points to a jdk package)

2010-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#576632: fixed in java-common 0.36 has caused the Debian Bug report #576632, regarding Description of default-jre points to a jdk package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#563070: marked as done (java-common: "update-java-alternatives --list " fails, w. patch.)

2010-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#563070: fixed in java-common 0.36 has caused the Debian Bug report #563070, regarding java-common: "update-java-alternatives --list " fails, w. patch. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#577482: marked as done (java-common: Please add sh4 to openjdk-6 support)

2010-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#577482: fixed in java-common 0.36 has caused the Debian Bug report #577482, regarding java-common: Please add sh4 to openjdk-6 support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#395372: marked as done (java-common: [policy] relax or expand the "binaries in /usr/bin" restriction (2.3))

2010-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#395372: fixed in java-common 0.36 has caused the Debian Bug report #395372, regarding java-common: [policy] relax or expand the "binaries in /usr/bin" restriction (2.3) to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#227594: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] Remove binfmt_misc, specify JARs for programs)

2010-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#227594: fixed in java-common 0.36 has caused the Debian Bug report #227594, regarding [PROPOSAL] Remove binfmt_misc, specify JARs for programs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

java-common_0.36_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-19 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-3

Processing of java-common_0.36_i386.changes

2010-04-19 Thread Archive Administrator
java-common_0.36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-common_0.36.dsc java-common_0.36.tar.gz java-common_0.36_all.deb default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb defa