Re: new version of zookeeper

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: > updated. Thank you. uploaded now. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/

Re: RFS: acgvision-agent [2nd try]

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Rémi Debay wrote: > Do you mean that the file is still in the .orig.tar ? yes > I thought I am not allowed to modify this file except if it's the first > version (and it's the fifth). That is maybe a limitation of the mentors server? I don't know. You could hav

Re: RFS: acgvision-agent [2nd try]

2010-04-29 Thread Rémi Debay
Hi Torsten, Do you mean that the file is still in the .orig.tar ? I thought I am not allowed to modify this file except if it's the first version (and it's the fifth). If it is allowed, I d be glad if you delete it but could you explain me how to proceed (Except if it is a easy untar rm tar stuf

Re: RFS: acgvision-agent [2nd try]

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Rémi, On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Rémi Debay wrote: > I deleted the file  etc/InstallCert.java. I don't use it. this file is still in the tarball. Do you want me to remove it before uploading the package? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: [Pkg-scala-maint] Debian Java track at DebConf 10

2010-04-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/04/2010 17:11, Pablo Duboue wrote: > > Just for the record, in case we get other people interested in running a BoF Actually, if there are people interested in such topics during DebCamp, we can get a table and discuss. I think that it will be more effective, and simpler to organize. my 2

Re: [Pkg-scala-maint] Debian Java track at DebConf 10

2010-04-29 Thread Pablo Duboue
On Thursday 29 April 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 29/04/2010 04:26, Pablo Duboue wrote: > > How do you feel about coordinating a BoF session on non-Java JVM-based > > languages? That's a very quick to write submission and if Ramakrishnan > > attends, we will have at least another person intereste

Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 29/04/2010 13:32, Torsten Werner a écrit : But neither com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2 nor com.sun.xml.bind.v2 are public APIs. The API is javax.xml.bind and it wouldn't help to package another implementation that can break in the future. Do you think otherwise? I don't think so, the API isn't

Re: Preferred jax-rs implementation?

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
Thomas Koch schrieb: > There are several implementations of jax-rs[1], neither one I've found to be > packaged in Debian. But do you prefer any of these, which maybe doesn't rely > on private APIs and releases sane tarballs? I don't know if any of them are better when it comes to Debian packagin

Re: Preferred jax-rs implementation?, was:Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Matthias Klose
On 29.04.2010 14:21, Thomas Koch wrote: Torsten Werner: Emmanuel Bourg schrieb: That sounds a bit risky and prone to break in the future. The JAXB RI is licensed under CDDL+GPL2, so it should be possible to package it and depend on this version instead. But neither com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v

Preferred jax-rs implementation?, was:Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Thomas Koch
Torsten Werner: > Emmanuel Bourg schrieb: > > That sounds a bit risky and prone to break in the future. The JAXB RI is > > licensed under CDDL+GPL2, so it should be possible to package it and > > depend on this version instead. > > But neither com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2 nor com.sun.xml.bind.v2 a

Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Emmanuel Bourg schrieb: > That sounds a bit risky and prone to break in the future. The JAXB RI is > licensed under CDDL+GPL2, so it should be possible to package it and > depend on this version instead. But neither com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2 nor co

Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Thomas Koch a écrit : Thank you, I'll have no problem to do a search-replace over multiple files. Vim to the rescue! But that's not my concern. My question is, whether I'm allowed to use com.sun.xml.internal or if this is "internal" and my change at any point in the future or across different

Re: [Pkg-scala-maint] Debian Java track at DebConf 10

2010-04-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/04/2010 04:26, Pablo Duboue wrote: > > How do you feel about coordinating a BoF session on non-Java JVM-based > languages? That's a very quick to write submission and if Ramakrishnan > attends, we will have at least another person interested in Clojure. > I never did that. So, I don't kn

Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Thomas Koch
Torsten Werner: > Torsten Werner schrieb: > > I have tried ant's filtering but it does not work. You can run > > sed recursively. > > I'm stupid. > > > > >to="com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2"/> > > > > > just works. > > Cheers, > Torsten Thank you, I'll have no p

Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
Torsten Werner schrieb: > I have tried ant's filtering but it does not work. You can run > sed recursively. I'm stupid. just works. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list

Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
Thomas Koch schrieb: > Danke. But do you know a way how I tell javac during compilation of jersey > that it should use com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2 where the import statement > says com.sun.xml.bind.v2? I have tried ant's filtering but it does not work. You can run sed recursively. Please file

Re: where to get jaxb from?

2010-04-29 Thread Thomas Koch
Torsten Werner: > Hi Thomas, > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > > for packaging jersey (dependency of a hbase contrib) I need jaxb. Now > > this page make me believe, that jaxb (com.sun.xml.bind.v2) is included in > > openjdk6: > > http://weblogs.java.net/blog/325/2008/02/