Le 27/06/2013 19:41, Jakub Adam a écrit :
> If anyone needs SWT 4.2 or 4.3 right now, it's possible to have a package
> allowing parallel installation with 3.8, though. I haven't seen any such
> request yet.
The recent versions of Azureus/Vuze use SWT 4.2, so if someone can
package it that would
On 27.6.2013 17:06, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
Why not work on SWT 4.2.2 instead ? I see there have been some
work for SWT 4.2.0 on Git, which has later stopped.
4.2 has the same issue so just updating wouldn't solve this problem.
Moreover, Eclipse 3.8 doesn't run with SWT 4.x. I plan on updati
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:38:53AM +0200, Jakub Adam wrote:
> This version fixes FTBFS with glib >= 2.35.
---end quoted text---
Why not work on SWT 4.2.2 instead ? I see there have been some
work for SWT 4.2.0 on Git, which has later stopped.
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital
On 06/26/2013 05:25 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-06-06 14:17, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 06/06/2013 06:51, tony mancill a écrit :
>>
>>> Have you had a chance to build the reverse build dependencies yet?
>> I checked the reverse dependencies, here is the result:
>>
>> biojava3-live
I've made contact with Guillaume Brocker and he is happy to release Eclox
under a different license.
Which would be better for Debian; GPL + permission to combine with Eclipse,
or EPL?
On 2013-06-27 14:37, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I've made contact with Guillaume Brocker and he is happy to release Eclox
> under a different license.
> Which would be better for Debian; GPL + permission to combine with Eclipse,
> or EPL?
>
Of those two, either should do (though it assumes a proper wo
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package "swt-gtk".
* Package name: swt-gtk
Version : 3.8.2-3
Upstream Author : The Eclipse Foundation
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/swt/
* License : EPL-1.0
Section : libs
It builds those b
On 26 June 2013 17:31, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I always considered the two licenses for completely incompatiable, but
> it is possible that interpretation have been too zealous. But IANAL.
>
A friend referred me to blog posts [1] [2] which provide more information
on the EPL/GPL issue.
The FSF b
8 matches
Mail list logo
