Hi there again.
On Sep 02 2013, Rogério Brito wrote:
I wonder if, somehow, changing to team-maintenance wouldn't be better for
the package overall? Perhaps the highly skilled people that already package
Java things for Debian may be interested in this? I'm CCing them.
Otherwise, changing
On 06/09/2013 23:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote:
The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to
bypass default-jdk in order to get things working...
What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse
and others,
On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote:
The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to
bypass default-jdk in order to get things working...
What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse
and others, that can't build with gcj?
I think the risk is
Steven Chamberlain:
It fails to build with our default-jdk. On kfreebsd that is currently
gcj, which seems insufficient to build eclipse.
So, eclipse could maybe change to a more specific build-depends if
that's appropriate, so that openjdk-7-jdk is used, since we do have it.
Or otherwise
but eclipse in kfreebsd fails to build or eclipse 4.x versions fails?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1378517459.6796.0.camel@debian
5 matches
Mail list logo