Re: gephi debian package

2013-09-06 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there again. On Sep 02 2013, Rogério Brito wrote: I wonder if, somehow, changing to team-maintenance wouldn't be better for the package overall? Perhaps the highly skilled people that already package Java things for Debian may be interested in this? I'm CCing them. Otherwise, changing

Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 06/09/2013 23:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote: The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to bypass default-jdk in order to get things working... What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse and others,

Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote: The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to bypass default-jdk in order to get things working... What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse and others, that can't build with gcj? I think the risk is

Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Robert Millan
Steven Chamberlain: It fails to build with our default-jdk. On kfreebsd that is currently gcj, which seems insufficient to build eclipse. So, eclipse could maybe change to a more specific build-depends if that's appropriate, so that openjdk-7-jdk is used, since we do have it. Or otherwise

Re: Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Bruno Maximo e Melo
but eclipse in kfreebsd fails to build or eclipse 4.x versions fails? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1378517459.6796.0.camel@debian