[Please CC me - I'm not subscribed]
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:48:41AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> needed. While this is beeing clarified we could probably do the
> move to Debian Java. The package is maintained currently here:
>
> Vcs-Svn: svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/pac
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 17:54 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Thank you for stepping in Russel.
No problem, glad to help.
> Just to clarify the "unique version policy" isn't an absolute
> requirement. If it's necessary multiple versions of an application or
> library can be packaged (for example JUn
Le 18/04/2014 18:22, Wookey a écrit :
> Is that a problem at your end or mine?
I gave the browse URL, the clone URL is:
https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-java/openjdk-8.git
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
+++ Emmanuel Bourg [2014-04-18 14:02 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> OpenJDK 8 is being packaged [1] and I'm looking for porters willing to
> try and compile it on other architectures. So far it builds fine on
> amd64 and some work has started for kFreeBSD. No other architecture has
> been tested yet, so any he
Hi,
On 18/04/14 17:18, Russel Winder wrote:
The core problem here with the Java and Groovy support on Debian is the
policy of one and only one version, and no use of Maven Central or
Bintray/jCentre for build.
I am not aware of any such policy as "one and only one version": one
could have a "gr
Thank you for stepping in Russel.
Just to clarify the "unique version policy" isn't an absolute
requirement. If it's necessary multiple versions of an application or
library can be packaged (for example JUnit 3 and 4, Maven 2 and 3,
Tomcat 6&7&8, ASM 3 and 4, etc).
Thanks to your explanations it
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 00:44 +0100, Stephen Nelson wrote:
[…]
>
> I'm looking at this too, as it stops work on building Spring using
> Gradle. I updated groovy to 1.8.9, and still gradle fails. So I
> thought about including the required dependencies to enable the groovy
> tests. This will prove th
Hi,
On 16.04.2014 23:54, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a status report on the Java 8 transition:
>
[...]
>
> Issues blocking the upload:
> - debian/copyright update
I am going to look into this.
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
OpenJDK 8 is being packaged [1] and I'm looking for porters willing to
try and compile it on other architectures. So far it builds fine on
amd64 and some work has started for kFreeBSD. No other architecture has
been tested yet, so any help is welcome.
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
[1] http://an
On 18/04/2014 09:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> 2. How to fix this Class format issue?
> You have to export JAVA_HOME in debian/rules, otherwise the build will
> use the current Java alternative which may not be default-jdk.
>
Or make sure that javac gets this argument "-target 1.6" (version 50)
Le 18/04/2014 08:48, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> 1. Should I move the package to Debian Java and if yes, are
> ACLs set that any DD can commit to Debian Java or do I need
> to become a member of the team? Should I commit to Git or
> SVN.
Only members have write access to the repos
Hi Andreas,
Le 18/04/2014 08:48, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> I have another candidate (as starting point - probably more to come)
> which is not yet in Debian since some license clarifications are
> needed. While this is beeing clarified we could probably do the
> move to Debian Java. The package
12 matches
Mail list logo
