Re: Bye bye Debian Java

Hi Sylvestre, Le 05/02/2015 23:11, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : > Just a quick email to let you know that I am going to quit this team. > Indeed, since I started my new job at Mozilla, I am not longer using > most of the packages I used to maintain. Therefor, my interest in Java > software has decre

Re: knopflerfish-osgi update (affects libwoodstox-java)

Hi Felix, Thank you for working on this upgrade. Le 07/02/2015 23:07, Felix Natter a écrit : > I would like to upgrade knopflerfish-osgi since freeplane 1.3.15 > requires >= 4.1 (maybe >= 5, I'll have to check). > > The only other rdep is libwoodstox-java. Any risk of affecting the transitive

Updating the felix and osgi stack

Hi folks, I am working on an update for felix-main and felix-framework. While I was at it I discovered that more and more dependencies had to be updated as well. So far the following packages were updated: felix-main felix-gogo-command felix-gogo-runtime felix-bundlerepository osgi-compendium os

Bug#777550: java-common: Bash completion for update-java-alternatives

Package: java-common Version: 0.52 Severity: wishlist update-java-alternatives could be enhanced with bash completion. After typing --set it would be nice to have an auto completion of the available alternatives. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Processed: tagging 730133

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 730133 + pending Bug #730133 [src:java-common] java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 730133: http://bugs.debian.org/

Re: Rationale for library dependencies on default-jre or default-jre-headless?

Le 09/02/2015 15:37, Hilko Bengen a écrit : > Am I missing something? This was the norm up to squeeze and it started changing with wheezy I think. The policy just needs an update, there is a change pending in svn that hasn't been uploaded yet (see #730133). Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Rationale for library dependencies on default-jre or default-jre-headless?

Hi! The Debian policy for Java as shipped with java-common-0.52 states: > 2.4. Java libraries > > [...] > >Libraries must depend on the needed runtime environment >(default-jre and/or default-jre-headless if need a GUI or not). What is the rationale for this? IMO, in general, pure libra

Processed: tagging 770579

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 770579 + pending Bug #770579 [java-common] java-common: Please remove me from uploaders Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 770579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Processed: closing 699757

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 699757 Bug #699757 [default-jdk] Java 6 support ending, Java 7 not in squeeze Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 699757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69975