Adding to Suggests sounds good, so be it :) And I will switch it to cglib3
later.
Markus Koschany 於 2015年10月6日週二 02:10 寫道：
> Am 05.10.2015 um 20:00 schrieb 殷啟聰:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did not have the time to check the build-rdeps. My major plan is to
> > update groovy now.
> >
> > Maybe we can place
Am 05.10.2015 um 20:00 schrieb 殷啟聰:
> Hi,
>
> I did not have the time to check the build-rdeps. My major plan is to
> update groovy now.
>
> Maybe we can place full runtime as Recommends and leave headless one as
> Depends, and explain it in the package description? Splitting out a new
> package
Hi,
I did not have the time to check the build-rdeps. My major plan is to
update groovy now.
Maybe we can place full runtime as Recommends and leave headless one as
Depends, and explain it in the package description? Splitting out a new
package seems odd, since launching GUI is using a parameter
Am 05.10.2015 um 19:41 schrieb 殷啟聰:
> Hi Debian Java maintainers,
>
> I recently finished up updating Gradle to 2.7 (although there will be
> 2.8 soon). This update covers the ongoing transition to
> libservlet3.1-java. Note that this version of Gradle will be built
> using the existing gradle_2.5
Thank you very much for the update Kai. I'm just concerned by the JRE
change, since installing gradle on a headless server will now pull
useless graphical libraries. The GUI tool should either be moved to a
separate gradle-gui package depending on a non headless JRE, or the non
headless JRE should
Hi Debian Java maintainers,
I recently finished up updating Gradle to 2.7 (although there will be
2.8 soon). This update covers the ongoing transition to
libservlet3.1-java. Note that this version of Gradle will be built
using the existing gradle_2.5-3 in sid/unstable. I am looking for
someone to
Hi,
I have filed bug reports to remind us and fellow maintainers that the
following libraries are obsolete or should / can be updated to newer
versions:
- libcommons-net2-java
- libasm3-java
- libcommons-httpclient-java
- libservlet2.5-java
I have also created a Wiki page which provides a simple
Hi Emmanuel,
On Montag, 5. Oktober 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Thank you very much for the changes. Let's see how it goes, but I
> suspect the volume of notifications will be much better and the need for
> individual subscriptions less critical.
we'll see. you are still subscribed to 1000 diffe
Dear Mentors,
I've sent to this list an email a couple of days ago with subject: RFS:
eclipse-titan/5.3-1 [ITP]
I haven't get any response yet. Please, can you check if you received my email?
Best Regards,
Gergely Pilisi
Le 03/10/2015 02:56, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> I've limited notifications to unstable and experimental now, and also
> improved
> the code a bit that only one mail per is sent per source package in all
> suites, no matter how many status changes it had. But we should still improve
> it to allo
10 matches
Mail list logo
