Re: Kotlin: looking for a DD to review/upload

Hi, I have a brand new infant to take care of and will take a few weeks to fix the remaining review comments. I am glad to see that openjdk-8 has moved in to Debian unstable again. Thanks, -- Sunil

openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:23:01 +0200 Source: openjdk-8 Architecture: source Version: 8u292-b10-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Java Maintenance Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser Closes: 822348 863199 906111 Ch

Processing of openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2_source.changes

openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.dsc openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#906111: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre: Package should Provide: java-runtime)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:48:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#906111: fixed in openjdk-8 8u292-b10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #906111, regarding openjdk-8-jre: Package should Provide: java-runtime to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#863199: marked as done (error creating symbolic link '/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:48:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#863199: fixed in openjdk-8 8u292-b10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #863199, regarding error creating symbolic link '/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#822348: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:48:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#822348: fixed in openjdk-8 8u292-b10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #822348, regarding openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: oops

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 989736 = wontfix Bug #989736 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: keep out of testing and stable Added tag(s) wontfix; removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 989736: https://bugs.debia

Processed: more openjdk-8 bug maintenance

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # this is here for keeps > tags 989736 moreinfo Bug #989736 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: keep out of testing and stable Added tag(s) moreinfo. > outlook 989736 This package is required for JVM language bootstrapping in > unstable, and used to prepa

Processed (with 1 error): this is also pending inquiry

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 760982 > reopen 760982 Bug #760982 {Done: Debian FTP Masters } [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8 needs time zone data 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need

Processed: ca-certificates-java: postinst fails under qemu-aarch64-static ⇒ is a qemu issue

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 920562 qemu-user-static Bug #920562 [src:openjdk-8] ca-certificates-java: postinst fails under qemu-aarch64-static 2.11.1(Debian 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.9) with uncaught target signal 6 Bug reassigned from package 'src:openjdk-8' to 'qemu-

Bug#920562: ca-certificates-java: postinst fails under qemu-aarch64-static ⇒ is a qemu issue

reassign 920562 qemu-user-static forcemerge 986022 920562 thanks This is pretty much the same issue, just for arm64 emulation. bye, //mirabilos -- Gestern Nacht ist mein IRC-Netzwerk explodiert. Ich hatte nicht damit gerechnet, darum bin ich blutverschmiert… wer konnte ahnen, daß SIE so reagier’

Bug#907541: [openjdk-8] Bind to a multicast address fails

Hi Andre, > This was supposed to be fixed upstream in Java 12: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210493 > > However it was taken back again (see last comment in that issue) and is now > supposedly fixed in java 13: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215294 > https://bugs.openjd