Andrew Haley wrote:
OK, so you're not picking up the precompiled classes for some reason.
Not good, but the fact that the CPU is only at 5% indicates that isn't
the core problem.
I believe that the problem lies in our NIO implementation. I don't know
exactly what the problem is. It has b
JNI _do_ mix.
AG
--
Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Red Hat, Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 06:07, Brett Smith wrote:
> At this point, I'm stumped again. If anybody has any suggestions as to
> where the problem might lie, they would be a tremendous help.
The problem is that Class.forName is not able to find the driver in the
shared library you just built.
Run your
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 06:07, Brett Smith wrote:
> At this point, I'm stumped again. If anybody has any suggestions as to
> where the problem might lie, they would be a tremendous help.
The problem is that Class.forName is not able to find the driver in the
shared library you just built.
Run your
gt; free Java implementations
>
> I believe Anthony Green has used this package with gcj in the past.
> I haven't done it myself.
That's right - it works very well. If you're using a recent version of
gcj, you should be able to check the sources out from
http://sources.redha
gt; free Java implementations
>
> I believe Anthony Green has used this package with gcj in the past.
> I haven't done it myself.
That's right - it works very well. If you're using a recent version of
gcj, you should be able to check the sources out from
http://sources.redha
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:30, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
> Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my being lazy by
> posting this question here: Have you heard of it? Is it free? Does it
> work with GCJ?
SWT is not Free Software, but it is open source and has a liberal
license.
Tr
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:30, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
> Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my being lazy by
> posting this question here: Have you heard of it? Is it free? Does it
> work with GCJ?
SWT is not Free Software, but it is open source and has a liberal
license.
Tr
Tom Tromey wrote:
> I'm unaware of a libffi port to HPPA. If there is one, it hasn't been
> integrated into the main libffi sources :-(
There is none.
AG
Tom Tromey wrote:
> I'm unaware of a libffi port to HPPA. If there is one, it hasn't been
> integrated into the main libffi sources :-(
There is none.
AG
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin wrote:
> I think this will become more popular when woody ships (with GCC 3.0x and
GCJ).
> Right now many people aren't running GCJ.
I guess we'll have to wait longer than that even because most of rhug doesn't
build or run correctly without the use of the GCC trunk (what will eventually
be
Kevin wrote:
> I think this will become more popular when woody ships (with GCC 3.0x and
GCJ).
> Right now many people aren't running GCJ.
I guess we'll have to wait longer than that even because most of rhug doesn't
build or run correctly without the use of the GCC trunk (what will eventually
be
Guillaume wrote:
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with gcj
built binaries. We are building shared libraries and executables out of many
of the packages you've identified for j
Guillaume wrote:
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with gcj
built binaries. We are building shared libraries and executables out of many
of the packages you've identified for
On Friday, July 21, 2000 2:50 PM, Ean R . Schuessler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Just realizing this. :)
>
> Does someone want to pick libffi up?
I am the libffi author and would happy to answer questions should they arise.
AG
On Friday, July 21, 2000 2:50 PM, Ean R . Schuessler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> Just realizing this. :)
>
> Does someone want to pick libffi up?
I am the libffi author and would happy to answer questions should they arise.
AG
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
re very close to coming to an agreement
with the FSF that paves the way for a merger of sorts between libgcj
and GNU Classpath.
AG
--
Anthony Green Cygnus Solutions
Sunnyvale, California
17 matches
Mail list logo
