Re: Mass filing of bugs

2002-12-02 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 02-12-2002, godz. 08:18, Ola Lundqvist pisze: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 09:50:36AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > > > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ola> Programs must depend on java-virtual-machine (because they > > Ola> will need it in order to

Re: Mass filing of bugs

2002-12-02 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 02-12-2002, godz. 08:18, Ola Lundqvist pisze: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 09:50:36AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > > > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ola> Programs must depend on java-virtual-machine (because they > > Ola> will need it in order to

Re: Not yet a policy proposal but...

2002-10-20 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z sob, 19-10-2002, godz. 22:56, Tom Tromey pisze: > >>>>> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Grzegorz> If you look in two places - at #163197 (which says about > Grzegorz> conflicting files, like /usr/include

Not yet a policy proposal but...

2002-10-16 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
Hi! If you look in two places - at #163197 (which says about conflicting files, like /usr/include/jni.h, and for ex. at output of: apt-cache show libgcj3-dev The Conflicts: line is here interesting: Conflicts: libgcj0, libgcj0-dev, libgcj300-dev, libgcj2-dev Bzzz... IMO it asks for virtual conf

Not yet a policy proposal but...

2002-10-16 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
Hi! If you look in two places - at #163197 (which says about conflicting files, like /usr/include/jni.h, and for ex. at output of: apt-cache show libgcj3-dev The Conflicts: line is here interesting: Conflicts: libgcj0, libgcj0-dev, libgcj300-dev, libgcj2-dev Bzzz... IMO it asks for virtual con

Re: libsax-java

2002-10-03 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
More library packages could easily be moved to main if there was a free > usable javadoc replacement. Grzegorz Prokopski intended to package gjdoc > (see http://bugs.debian.org/156411) but it looks like the problems he had > with the FTP admins when he tried to upload sablevm changed his mi

Re: libsax-java

2002-10-03 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
More library packages could easily be moved to main if there was a free > usable javadoc replacement. Grzegorz Prokopski intended to package gjdoc > (see http://bugs.debian.org/156411) but it looks like the problems he had > with the FTP admins when he tried to upload sablevm changed his mi

Re: Packaging a library, with JNI and javadocs

2002-09-12 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z czw, 12-09-2002, godz. 20:17, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze: > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ok. I'm thinking that maybe -java shoud be for "true" java and then > > use -jni for everything that is not "true" java. > > FWIW, perl libraries are currently packaged as ...-perl

Re: Packaging a library, with JNI and javadocs

2002-09-12 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z czw, 12-09-2002, godz. 20:17, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze: > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ok. I'm thinking that maybe -java shoud be for "true" java and then > > use -jni for everything that is not "true" java. > > FWIW, perl libraries are currently packaged as ...-perl

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

2002-08-14 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
> > - it's upstream is really interested in having robust and widely used > > JVM [2], not only another research tool for students > > - it is written in pure C, should be very easily portable to other > > architectures (currently it supports x86, not sure about alpha, but in > > few months s

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environmentconsising of free Java tools

2002-08-14 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
> > - it's upstream is really interested in having robust and widely used > > JVM [2], not only another research tool for students > > - it is written in pure C, should be very easily portable to other > > architectures (currently it supports x86, not sure about alpha, but in > > few months

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

2002-08-13 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 20:40, Tom Tromey pisze: > >> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding > >> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I > >> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps). > Grzegorz, perhaps you could

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environmentconsising of free Java tools

2002-08-13 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 20:40, Tom Tromey pisze: > >> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding > >> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I > >> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps). > Grzegorz, perhaps you coul

Re: free-java-sdk and friends - status report

2002-08-13 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 17:16, Grzegorz Prokopski pisze: > deb http://debian.sente.pl/debian ./ It should have been: deb http://debian.sente.pl ./ Sorry! GBP signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

2002-08-13 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 21:22, Adam Heath pisze: > So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is > better than these others? Below I am forwarding parts of a mail from sablevm author, Etienne M. Gagnon [...] > > I also looked at porting abilities - I think th

free-java-sdk and friends - status report

2002-08-13 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
Hello! First I wanted to thank all who discussed about the idea of free-java-sdk. I have included small FAQ and (as adviced) I'll be including some documentation about 'why ABC is better than XYZ'. But now - to the facts - what I have now. I think you can try it yourself, just add to /etc/apt/sou

Re: free-java-sdk and friends - status report

2002-08-13 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 17:16, Grzegorz Prokopski pisze: > deb http://debian.sente.pl/debian ./ It should have been: deb http://debian.sente.pl ./ Sorry! GBP signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environmentconsising of free Java tools

2002-08-13 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 21:22, Adam Heath pisze: > So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is > better than these others? Below I am forwarding parts of a mail from sablevm author, Etienne M. Gagnon [...] > > I also looked at porting abilities - I think t

free-java-sdk and friends - status report

2002-08-13 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
Hello! First I wanted to thank all who discussed about the idea of free-java-sdk. I have included small FAQ and (as adviced) I'll be including some documentation about 'why ABC is better than XYZ'. But now - to the facts - what I have now. I think you can try it yourself, just add to /etc/apt/so

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

2002-08-12 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 21:22, Adam Heath pisze: > On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote: > > W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze: > > > Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the > > > depends. > So,

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environmentconsising of free Java tools

2002-08-12 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 21:22, Adam Heath pisze: > On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote: > > W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze: > > > Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the > > > depends. &g

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

2002-08-12 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze: > Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the > depends. I am not really restricting you to anything. You're free to create your own java devel environment. It's all free software and I can't really make any

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environmentconsising of free Java tools

2002-08-12 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze: > Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the > depends. I am not really restricting you to anything. You're free to create your own java devel environment. It's all free software and I can't really make an

Re: dummy java2-runtime in sid?

2002-08-08 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z czw, 08-08-2002, godz. 13:51, Grzegorz Prokopski pisze: > W liście z czw, 08-08-2002, godz. 11:21, Thomas J. Zeeman pisze: > > > I'm sure there used to be a dummy java package so that you could install > > > packages that depended on a jre package, but you

Re: dummy java2-runtime in sid?

2002-08-08 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z czw, 08-08-2002, godz. 11:21, Thomas J. Zeeman pisze: > > I'm sure there used to be a dummy java package so that you could install > > packages that depended on a jre package, but you supplied your own? > Yup, they used to exist. They've been pulled 'cause ftp-masters don't > seem to li

java policy - when? [was: Re: policy proposal: java2 alternative]

2002-08-04 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z nie, 04-08-2002, godz. 11:54, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze: > So I propose the following addition to java-policy: Providers of That reminds me of the fact that java-policy is still in "proposed" state. Is there much to be added to it before it can be called done? Maybe we should remove some

java policy - when? [was: Re: policy proposal: java2 alternative]

2002-08-04 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z nie, 04-08-2002, godz. 11:54, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze: > So I propose the following addition to java-policy: Providers of That reminds me of the fact that java-policy is still in "proposed" state. Is there much to be added to it before it can be called done? Maybe we should remove some

Reqest for review: ArgoUML java packages

2002-07-05 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
ul for pointing out any mistakes I made. Thanks in advance Grzegorz Prokopski PS: There are still some small legal issues that hold the inclusion into the archive, but I hope to have them resolved soon. One of them is that in dresden-ocl in src/tudresden/ocl/im

Reqest for review: ArgoUML java packages

2002-07-05 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
ul for pointing out any mistakes I made. Thanks in advance Grzegorz Prokopski PS: There are still some small legal issues that hold the inclusion into the archive, but I hope to have them resolved soon. One of them is that in dresden-ocl in src/tudresden/ocl/im

Packaging java program - questions (dependencies on j2, jboss story)

2002-05-09 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
to enter main? Best regards Grzegorz Prokopski signature.asc Description: PGP signature