On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 16:05:50 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team
> for Jessie:
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7
>
Why does this need to be a release goal?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
Control: retitle -1 openjdk-6 should not be released with jessie
Control: tag -1 + wheezy-ignore
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 14:08:44 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 21:35:09 schreef Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 17:43:57 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> OpenJDK Security support has always been a nightmare for the security
> team because there was no support from the maintainers. Security support
> s primarily the responsibility of the maintainer.
>
> If you dump two packages in
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 20:12:07 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> - AFAIK, there is still 50+ FTBFS [3] :/
>
Could somebody verify and file those in the debian bts as a first step?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:10:39 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.01.2011 20:46, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >Do you plane to switch to IcedTea 1.9 or a later version during the
> >squeeze release?
>
> I will not do this myself, altough I would welcome this. Apparently
> Debian does allow these
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606295 squeeze-is-blocker
kthxbye
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:26:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> This needs to be fixed for squeeze, we can't support this package if it
> can't be built; and there's a bunch of reverse de
This needs to be fixed for squeeze, we can't support this package if it
can't be built; and there's a bunch of reverse dependencies so removal
looks painful. Adding debian-java to cc, help is needed to fix
libhibernate3-java's build.
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 13:14:30 -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 21:32:52 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> First, I am assuming that I should set the version number to be
> 6b18-1.8.3-2+lenny1 and upload to stable-security with urgency=high. Can you
> confirm that this is the desired target?
>
No, the version number must be less than in sq
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 19:25:52 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - build dependencies should be of the form openjdk-6-jdk |
>cacao-oj6-jdk, or else builds will fail on s390.
>
Why would that make a difference? Alternatives in build-deps aren't
considered by sbuild.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To U
9 matches
Mail list logo
