On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:12:13PM +, Ean Schuessler wrote:
It appears that I have been attempting to upload my packages to the
regular FTP queue. I haven't been uploading them anonymously. I don't know
how I failed to see that this doesn't work but I thought it was working
and assumed
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:22:26PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
* New upstream release (Closes: #215095).
- Closes: #225702
Already explained in the bug report
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:45:28PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
What is the meaning of these lines in the changelog
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:22:26PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
* New upstream release (Closes: #215095).
- Closes: #225702
Already explained in the bug report, also, see kaffe changelog:
2003-08-28 Guilhem Lavaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
- Closes: #225691
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I mean, the fix won't go into stable anyway since it isn't security
related, right?
This is a myth that somehow continues to be perpetuated despite a list of
criteria in every message that Joey sends about point release
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:16:31AM +0100, Mariano García wrote:
I am installing tomcat with apache on Debian (testing). Looking for
information I have found that I need mod-jk apache module, and I have
found some references about libapache-mod-jk debian package.
But if I do a 'apt-cache
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:14:34PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
that keep kaffe from reentering testing. The details are at
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kaffe
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:29:10AM +0100, Marcus Crafter wrote:
Hope everyone had a nice weekend.
Just updated my system to the latest set of unstable packages, and for
some reason Eclipse and my other apps are failing to start, with java
core dumping in fact.
This only happens with IBM
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:26:48PM +0100, Jan Schulz wrote:
I'm actually not sure, what IBM offers there: They have a JDK for
32-bit xSeries (Intel compatible), 32-bit iSeries/pSeries, 64-bit
iSeries/pSeries, 31-bit zSeries (S/390) and 64-bit zSeries (S/390).
Maybe someone can enlighten me,
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:11:06AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
I used to be very busy/without net during last months but I am back.
And attacking ;-)
The problem is that currently jikes (in the sense of source package,
which is important from testing migration scripts POV) depends of
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
Package: jikes
Version: 1.18-6
Severity: wishlist
Please don't CC other addresses when mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the BTS
documentation about the X-Debbugs-CC header.
--
- mdz
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:11:06AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
I used to be very busy/without net during last months but I am back.
And attacking ;-)
The problem is that currently jikes (in the sense of source package,
which is important from testing migration scripts POV) depends of
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
Package: jikes
Version: 1.18-6
Severity: wishlist
Please don't CC other addresses when mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the BTS
documentation about the X-Debbugs-CC header.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:29:23AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
In addition, if a user wants to add their own classes to the classpath
(e.g., with jython where adding your own classes can be advantageous
even if the app itself doesn't need them), they can set $CLASSPATH
before running the script.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:29:23AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
In addition, if a user wants to add their own classes to the classpath
(e.g., with jython where adding your own classes can be advantageous
even if the app itself doesn't need them), they can set $CLASSPATH
before running the script.
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:21:22PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
* Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I like some of the ideas in your proposal, but things like Java Runtime
Environments, which are complient to the Java Spec of a specific Version,
have to provide the virtual package [...] and setup
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:58:58PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
Hallo Matt,
* Matt Zimmerman wrote:
and not an abstract idea of what is provided. For example, a package which
works with any java2 runtime, but also works with the interfaces provided by
kaffe, uses java2-runtime | kaffe, etc
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:21:22PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
* Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I like some of the ideas in your proposal, but things like Java Runtime
Environments, which are complient to the Java Spec of a specific Version,
have to provide the virtual package [...] and setup
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This sounds useful. I think it could be simplified to use comm(1) rather
than parsing a unified diff, though.
grep -f is more useful. See attached script.
How
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This sounds useful. I think it could be simplified to use comm(1) rather
than parsing a unified diff, though.
grep -f is more useful. See attached script.
How
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:04:30PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
But ... the FSF doesn't think that code licensed under a GPL incompatible
license can be allowed to run on a GPLd VM (i.e. kaffe).
Could you give a link that details this point?
s/point/insanity/
--
- mdz
--
To
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:40:11PM -0400, Michael R Head wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:18, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This is what update-alternatives does.
I actually use update-alternatives to point to
/usr/local/lib/j2sdk/bin/java which is a symlink to j2sdk1.4.2 or
whatever the latest I
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Friday 08 August 2003 14:26, Hein Meling wrote:
Every time I do an update, and there is a new version of sablevm (I
think), the alternatives system returns to auto mode and selects sablevm
as the default JVM, even
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:23:55PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
Looking at the configure file, and the bits that make it up, there is some
specific hand coded function to look for various bits of the JVM that
is to be used, much of which does not exist in GCJ. For a start they
look for an
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:23:55PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
Looking at the configure file, and the bits that make it up, there is some
specific hand coded function to look for various bits of the JVM that
is to be used, much of which does not exist in GCJ. For a start they
look for an
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:58:03PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
* Matt Zimmerman wrote:
JAVA_HOME seems silly in Debian, where we have alternatives to manage these
things. I wish it would go away.
I do not!
The current update-alternatives system isn't working, when you don't
have a way
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:40:11PM -0400, Michael R Head wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:18, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This is what update-alternatives does.
I actually use update-alternatives to point to
/usr/local/lib/j2sdk/bin/java which is a symlink to j2sdk1.4.2 or
whatever the latest I
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:26:34PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Friday 08 August 2003 15:15, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
But selecting an alternative by hand should set it to be manual, and it
should not be changed after that unless it is set back to auto.
Right... and I understood from
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:43:33PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
Incidentally, several java packages could move from contrib into main if
the maintainers could simply take the time to write their own Makefiles
instead of relying on the default ant build system which is in contrib,
e.g., #163168.
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:43:33PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
Incidentally, several java packages could move from contrib into main if
the maintainers could simply take the time to write their own Makefiles
instead of relying on the default ant build system which is in contrib,
e.g., #163168.
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:09:28PM -0700, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't it also require an import statement?
No. Import statements are syntactic sugar allowing you to use
the unqualified class name
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:54:38PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cat Test.java EOF
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Test0.foo();
new java.awt.Button();
new
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:09:28PM -0700, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't it also require an import statement?
No. Import statements are syntactic sugar allowing you to use
the unqualified class name
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:32:13PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Jan Schulz wrote:
* Hubert Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[mpkg-j2sdk]
Would you mind also providing 'j2re1.(4|3)' and would it be possible to
extend your script to JREs as well?
I am currently not
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:32:13PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Jan Schulz wrote:
* Hubert Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[mpkg-j2sdk]
Would you mind also providing 'j2re1.(4|3)' and would it be possible to
extend your script to JREs as well?
I am currently not
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Is there any reason to keep these packages? They are replaced by the
corresponding packages built from the gcc-3.3 source package.
I know of no reason why they cannot be removed.
--
- mdz
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:20:37PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
Very strange:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pkg-config --cflags gnome-vfs-2.0
-pthread -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0
-I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:05:19PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
* Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a Bug? How can I work around this? I don't want to
make this static, but keep the pkg-config call? Using sed
or suchlike?
Send a note to the gnome-vfs maintainer about
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 07:43:47AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi Alexander,
--- Alexander Hvostov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At issue is not convenience, but speed. Swing is horribly slow, so any
effort to speed it up seems worthy to me.
Just do it ;) Try getting in touch with the
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 06:58:05PM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
What about SWT? I've used it under both gij and from gcj-compiled code for
some simple tests.
SWT is great, but that doesn't help all the Swing applications, and
there's a few things Swing can do
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 07:25:30PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
After suggestions from Ola I extended the classloaded and it now works
with package dependencies.
If java is to be used in applications similar to traditional C shared
libraries, it is going to need to have version information
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:55:19PM +0100, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
[ibiblio mirror gone]
My question is now, where do I go to get the Blackdown JDK and what
entry should I put into my sources.list file to keep updated?
Check
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:17:55PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
This all seemed to be working fine in sarge, since there's a
java-virtual-machine-dummy dependency on tomcat4 there, and that let me
install my own JVM (Sun's JDK1.4) separately.
Any idea how this situation gets resolved?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:17:55PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
This all seemed to be working fine in sarge, since there's a
java-virtual-machine-dummy dependency on tomcat4 there, and that let me
install my own JVM (Sun's JDK1.4) separately.
Any idea how this situation gets resolved?
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:17:49AM +0100, Ahmed wrote:
I would like to package Apache Jakarta/XML software.
Of course, I have got to do it from sources, either releases or CVS.
Surprise... They are putting jars in CVS!
These jars are not only needed to build but also to run.
If you
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:58:50AM -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:30, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my being lazy by
posting this question here: Have you heard of it? Is it free? Does it
work with GCJ?
SWT is not
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:46:06AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
Antonio == Antonio Fiol Bonnín [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Antonio Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my
Antonio being lazy by posting this question here: Have you heard of
Antonio it? Is it free? Does it work with
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:58:50AM -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:30, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my being lazy by
posting this question here: Have you heard of it? Is it free? Does it
work with GCJ?
SWT is not
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at
all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the
apache website for how to do this.
Huh? What is necessary beyond uncommenting the
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at
all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the
apache website for how to do this.
Huh? What is necessary beyond uncommenting the
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:07:19AM -0500, Rick Lutowski wrote:
debian ships with NS 4,x in contrib.
Debian ships without Netscape Navigator or Communicator. Netscape Navigator
and Communicator 4.77 are in the non-free archive.
How difficult would it be be for the woody Netscape package to
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:07:19AM -0500, Rick Lutowski wrote:
debian ships with NS 4,x in contrib.
Debian ships without Netscape Navigator or Communicator. Netscape Navigator
and Communicator 4.77 are in the non-free archive.
How difficult would it be be for the woody Netscape package to
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:21:46PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:12:49AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Re-read what I wrote, and you will see that I made it perfectly clear
that non-free was not included in software available in Debian.
The software in question
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
software available in Debian
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:21:46PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:12:49AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Re-read what I wrote, and you will see that I made it perfectly clear
that non-free was not included in software available in Debian.
The software in question
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:42:48PM +0400, Lev B. Olkhovich wrote:
Sorry if that's obvious, but what's wrong with Sun jvm (JRE SE 1.4)?
I thought that it is suitable for non-free... (sections 2,3 of JRE SE
license)
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.html
--
- mdz
--
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:54:01PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
Ok then. I wasn't too sure about it anyway. By the way since there are
several different specifications (1.2, 1.3, 1.4) for java2 vm (and their
base libraries), shouldn't there be some way to handle dependencies on
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
packages being worked on list that openoffice debs are being prepared.
I am not sure how accurate this list is but openoffice is on. As far as
i know both
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:42:48PM +0400, Lev B. Olkhovich wrote:
Sorry if that's obvious, but what's wrong with Sun jvm (JRE SE 1.4)?
I thought that it is suitable for non-free... (sections 2,3 of JRE SE
license)
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.html
--
- mdz
--
To
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:54:01PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
Ok then. I wasn't too sure about it anyway. By the way since there are
several different specifications (1.2, 1.3, 1.4) for java2 vm (and their
base libraries), shouldn't there be some way to handle dependencies on
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
software available in
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
software available in
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:54:57PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +0200, Markus Garscha wrote:
i wonder if libapache-mod-webapp ist the right module, because it offers
no WebAppDeploy. Only WebAppMount is supported (but has the same
syntax as
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:54:57PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +0200, Markus Garscha wrote:
i wonder if libapache-mod-webapp ist the right module, because it offers
no WebAppDeploy. Only WebAppMount is supported (but has the same
syntax as WebAppDeploy).
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and
OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see
http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html).
If you haven't already, you should inform the GL4Java
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and
OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see
http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html).
If you haven't already, you should inform the GL4Java
What is the current consensus on the IBM JDK license? Text (conversion) and
HTML (as distributed) are attached They seem to have removed the
RedHat/Caldera-only clause that I remember seeing in earlier builds
We clearly cannot redistribute it, since the redistribution terms would
require the
What is the current consensus on the IBM JDK license? Text (conversion) and
HTML (as distributed) are attached. They seem to have removed the
RedHat/Caldera-only clause that I remember seeing in earlier builds.
We clearly cannot redistribute it, since the redistribution terms would
require the
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:25:40AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
Is there a page online that describes how to target jars for debian? I
have a problem that I'm working on that's dependant on another project's
distributable JAR file. Is there a standard way of installing a shared
JAR, such as
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:00:00PM -0600, Rick Lutowski wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
See /usr/share/doc/java-common/policy.txt.gz, section 2.4 (Java Libraries).
This file is not on my debian 2.2r2 system. Is it installed
as part of the debian java package? (If so, that would explain
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:44:51PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
I have created an experimental package of Tomcat 4.0.2 and put it at
http://people.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat4/
Please test it, read README.Debian (really!) and send me comments and
suggestions for improvements. I'll update the
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:34:33PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:08:13PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
hangs indefinitely, with no tomcat/java processes using CPU. Same thing for
a locally installed WAR application. It appears that a connection is
established
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:44:51PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
I have created an experimental package of Tomcat 4.0.2 and put it at
http://people.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat4/
Please test it, read README.Debian (really!) and send me comments and
suggestions for improvements. I'll update the
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:34:33PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:08:13PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
hangs indefinitely, with no tomcat/java processes using CPU. Same thing for
a locally installed WAR application. It appears that a connection is
established
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:45:36PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
4.0.2-0.1, which appears to be still the version at
http://people.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat4/
The current version is 0.6, 0.1 hasn't been there for over 40 hours (which
is a large amount of time
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:44:51PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
I have created an experimental package of Tomcat 4.0.2 and put it
at http://people.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat4/
Great, I will check these out soon.
- The package currently uses the included JARs from the
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:44:51PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
I have created an experimental package of Tomcat 4.0.2 and put it
at http://people.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat4/
Great, I will check these out soon.
- The package currently uses the included JARs from the
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:33:43AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins
(followups set to debian-devel; please take this off of debian-java if
replying)
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:57:11PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
I hope DMFR behaves differently, then, because I will probably miss
non-free. I have about a page worth of non-free software installed:
-
(followups set to debian-devel; please take this off of debian-java if
replying)
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:57:11PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
I hope DMFR behaves differently, then, because I will probably miss
non-free. I have about a page worth of non-free software installed:
-
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:02:12PM +, John Leuner wrote:
I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some
problems:
1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ?
java-compiler
(currently:
jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3
ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3
jikes 1.10-6
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:02:12PM +, John Leuner wrote:
I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some
problems:
1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ?
java-compiler
(currently:
jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3
ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3
jikes 1.10-6
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 08:51:08PM +, John Leuner wrote:
java-compiler
(currently:
jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3
ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3
jikes 1.10-6
java-compiler-dummy 0.2
guavac 1.2-2
gcj 1:2.95.2-20)
assuming jdk1.1-dev is the ibm jdk:
a) are we allowed to distribute
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:07:31AM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
How can I have swing working under potato r2? I've got jdk1.1 installed
and it doesn't contain this library (or I haven't seen it).
I've found in the faq of the mailing list a way to install them , but
I'd like to
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:03:40PM -0800, Aaron Brashears wrote:
Good point. The current method of debanizing jars is going to fail
soon, since most I've run into don't version stamp the filename.
Not really. If a given debianized jar needed to support multiple versions, it
could be modified
[CCed to:
debian-java, where this thread originated
the wnpp bug for Enhydra
debian-devel, to get broader input on source packaging issues
Please trim CC list as appropriate]
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
If the package is in
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 10:16:17AM +1000, Bradley Marshall wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:39:21PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I intend to package Enhydra, an open source Java/XML application server
http://www.enhydra.org/software/enhydra/index.html. It is licensed as
follows
87 matches
Mail list logo
