Subject says it all. I just got back from vacation so it will take me
a few days to get everything built and yes, Jack, I'll build a new
1.3.1 ppc package as well.
--
Stephen
"Farcical aquatic ceremonies are no basis for a system of government!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Takashi> I really want j2sdk in non-free. But I don't know key
Takashi> person to do it. Does anybody (especially Zander) discuss
Takashi> and negotiate about redistibution?
I suggest you search the -legal archives for nume
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Takashi> I really want j2sdk in non-free. But I don't know key
Takashi> person to do it. Does anybody (especially Zander) discuss
Takashi> and negotiate about redistibution?
I suggest you search the -legal archives for nume
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> I second this policy change. I would like one more to be able
Ola> to apply it.
Thirded (if it needed it).
--
Stephen
"And what do we burn apart from witches?"... "More witches!"
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> I second this policy change. I would like one more to be able
Ola> to apply it.
Thirded (if it needed it).
--
Stephen
"And what do we burn apart from witches?"... "More witches!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Takashi> But I think it's optional and it's the time to upload
Takashi> eclipse into sid. If you don't think so, please give me
Takashi> comments.
Go for it (don't forget to close my ITP)!
--
Stephen
I love catnip mice
I
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Takashi> But I think it's optional and it's the time to upload
Takashi> eclipse into sid. If you don't think so, please give me
Takashi> comments.
Go for it (don't forget to close my ITP)!
--
Stephen
I love catnip mice
I
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: 20030214
Severity: serious
Packages: jdk1.1, jdk1.1-native, jdk1.1-dev jdk1.1-native-dev
They're non-free, they're buggy because the ftp-masters refused to
even look at an upload for over six months, and I have no enthusiasm
for continuing to pursue support for Su
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: 20030214
Severity: serious
Packages: jdk1.1, jdk1.1-native, jdk1.1-dev jdk1.1-native-dev
They're non-free, they're buggy because the ftp-masters refused to
even look at an upload for over six months, and I have no enthusiasm
for continuing to pursue support for Su
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> Well. Do they have any reason for this?
Concerns about the redistribution of code that Debian has been
distributing for longer than the five years I've been a DD.
Actually, having to think about this again has helped me make up my
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> Well. Do they have any reason for this?
Concerns about the redistribution of code that Debian has been
distributing for longer than the five years I've been a DD.
Actually, having to think about this again has helped me make up my
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives
Ola> but not updates to it?
Yep. Impressive, huh!
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives
Ola> but not updates to it?
Yep. Impressive, huh!
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
Ben> all.
I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
packages. I won't beincluding it in the jdk1.1 package because the
ftp-nasters have alread
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing
Ben> from at all.
--
Stephen
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety -- Benjamin Franklin
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
Ben> all.
I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
packages. I won't beincluding it in the jdk1.1 package because the
ftp-nasters have alread
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing
Ben> from at all.
--
Stephen
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety -- Benjamin Franklin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 12:30:07AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Ola> I think that major new things (i.e. swing and awt) from java1
Ola> (from 1.0, or maybe only from 1.1 and above) should be broken
Ola> down.
What doe you
> "Joe" == Joe Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joe> On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:44, Adam Heath wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>> > + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search
>> and/or > a debconf dialog.
>>
>> Use /etc/defaults/jbo
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 12:30:07AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Ola> I think that major new things (i.e. swing and awt) from java1
Ola> (from 1.0, or maybe only from 1.1 and above) should be broken
Ola> down.
What doe you
> "Joe" == Joe Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joe> On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:44, Adam Heath wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>> > + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search
>> and/or > a debconf dialog.
>>
>> Use /etc/defaults/jbo
> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz B Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Grzegorz> As for my proposals, I think I'd do it this way:
Grzegorz> 1. Define exactly what requirements must be met for JVM
Grzegorz> to be able to _legally_ provide java-virtual-machine,
Grzegorz> java*-runtime e
> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz B Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Grzegorz> As for my proposals, I think I'd do it this way:
Grzegorz> 1. Define exactly what requirements must be met for JVM
Grzegorz> to be able to _legally_ provide java-virtual-machine,
Grzegorz> java*-runtime e
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias> so which runtimes do have complete awt support at all?
Matthias> The provides was added to build all packages which do
Matthias> not relay on all awt functionality. I would have to
Matthias> search the bug rep
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias> so which runtimes do have complete awt support at all?
Matthias> The provides was added to build all packages which do
Matthias> not relay on all awt functionality. I would have to
Matthias> search the bug rep
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> Well frankly I do not understand it fully either. What I
Ola> understand is that they have split JSRs and RIs. This means
Ola> that you are free to implement Java Specification Requests
Ola> (JSR) under open source. It do
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> Well frankly I do not understand it fully either. What I
Ola> understand is that they have split JSRs and RIs. This means
Ola> that you are free to implement Java Specification Requests
Ola> (JSR) under open source. It do
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:26:34AM +, Conrad Wood wrote:
>> hmm.. is there something like a jdk-dev package that follows
>> some well-defined standard on what is included? Or is it worth
>> putting a jdk-config script
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:26:34AM +, Conrad Wood wrote:
>> hmm.. is there something like a jdk-dev package that follows
>> some well-defined standard on what is included? Or is it worth
>> putting a jdk-config script
Ok, I should stop reading mail at 3am...
> "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders
Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make
Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can
> "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders
Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make
Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can depend on
Simon> the core classes for c
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it
Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If
Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide
Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it
Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If
Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide
Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no
Ok, I should stop reading mail at 3am...
> "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders
Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make
Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can
> "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders
Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make
Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can depend on
Simon> the core classes for c
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it
Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If
Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide
Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it
Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If
Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide
Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Currently the following packages in testing provide
Stefan> java1-runtime: gij-3.0, gij-3.2, orp-classpath and
Stefan> sablevm. All of them include (or depend on) a Java virtual
Stefan> machine so if I add this depen
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Currently the following packages in testing provide
Stefan> java1-runtime: gij-3.0, gij-3.2, orp-classpath and
Stefan> sablevm. All of them include (or depend on) a Java virtual
Stefan> machine so if I add this depen
> "Greg" == Greg Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greg> But isn't the whole library versioning thing meant to solve
Greg> this sort of things? why isn't the old libc kept about as
Greg> an explicit version that java can link directly to?
I suggest you consider the output of
> "Greg" == Greg Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greg> But isn't the whole library versioning thing meant to solve
Greg> this sort of things? why isn't the old libc kept about as
Greg> an explicit version that java can link directly to?
I suggest you consider the output of
> "Kates" == Kates Gasis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kates> Why is it that debian can not run the j2sdk1.4.0_01 jre. It
Kates> says that libstc++... can not find the libjvm.so. I have
Kates> set my path correctly. It happens even when I am already
Kates> root. By the way, I have
> "Alban" == Alban Peignier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alban> Does anyone run the blqckdown jdk1.3 into a sid
Alban> successfully ?
No, because it's not possible. All Blackdown JVM < 1.4 use internal
glibc symbols that ceased to exist with the release of glibc 2.3.1
--
Stephen
The
> "Kates" == Kates Gasis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kates> Why is it that debian can not run the j2sdk1.4.0_01 jre. It
Kates> says that libstc++... can not find the libjvm.so. I have
Kates> set my path correctly. It happens even when I am already
Kates> root. By the way, I have
> "Alban" == Alban Peignier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alban> Does anyone run the blqckdown jdk1.3 into a sid
Alban> successfully ?
No, because it's not possible. All Blackdown JVM < 1.4 use internal
glibc symbols that ceased to exist with the release of glibc 2.3.1
--
Stephen
The
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> Programs must depend on java-virtual-machine (because they
Ola> will need it in order to run).
Given's Dalibor Topic's comment on this list
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), should we
declare java[12]-runtime to be a superset of java-virtu
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> Programs must depend on java-virtual-machine (because they
Ola> will need it in order to run).
Given's Dalibor Topic's comment on this list
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), should we
declare java[12]-runtime to be a superset of java-virtu
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> What I think you're suggesting is that lib*-java classes
Stephen> would depend on a virtual package that provides the
Stephen> java.* classes, e.g. classpath, that was s
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> What I think you're suggesting is that lib*-java classes
Stephen> would depend on a virtual package that provides the
Stephen> java.* classes, e.g. classpath, that was s
> "Tony" == Tony Simone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> Are there any significant differences between the 1.4.0.99
Tony> Blackdown stuff you packaged and Sun's 1.4.0 or 1.4.1 JDK's?
Tony> I've been sticking with Sun's stuff so far because I know it
Tony> works with my apps and
> "Tony" == Tony Simone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> Are there any significant differences between the 1.4.0.99
Tony> Blackdown stuff you packaged and Sun's 1.4.0 or 1.4.1 JDK's?
Tony> I've been sticking with Sun's stuff so far because I know it
Tony> works with my apps and
> "Tony" == Tony Simone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> Quick summary: the sun-jdk1.4-installer package requires you
Tony> to download the Sun linux j2sdk archive (since Sun requires
Tony> you to do so and it's hard to automate around that), and it
Tony> provides a "build-sun-
> "Tony" == Tony Simone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> Quick summary: the sun-jdk1.4-installer package requires you
Tony> to download the Sun linux j2sdk archive (since Sun requires
Tony> you to do so and it's hard to automate around that), and it
Tony> provides a "build-sun-
> "Juergen" == Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unless 1.3.1 doesn't meet your needs, I'd say no.
Juergen> I'd say yes :-)
You would :P
Seriously, though, are you suggesting that j2sdk1.4 is worth taking on
the excitement that is the libc6 2.3.1 upgrede?
--
Stephen
> "Juergen" == Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unless 1.3.1 doesn't meet your needs, I'd say no.
Juergen> I'd say yes :-)
You would :P
Seriously, though, are you suggesting that j2sdk1.4 is worth taking on
the excitement that is the libc6 2.3.1 upgrede?
--
Stephen
> "Darryl" == Darryl L Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darryl> I guess, based on the dependancy on libc6 2.3.1-1 or
Darryl> better, I'm going to have to upgrade to unstable to get
Darryl> this work? I'm using sarge currently. Is it worth it?
Unless 1.3.1 doesn't meet your needs,
> "Darryl" == Darryl L Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darryl> Is someone working to add a 1.4 JDK to debian?
The long story was already mentioned. I'll just add that adding
deb http://mirror.of.blackdown.org/pub/debian/ unstable main non-free
to /etc/apt/souces.list, followed by
> "Darryl" == Darryl L Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darryl> I guess, based on the dependancy on libc6 2.3.1-1 or
Darryl> better, I'm going to have to upgrade to unstable to get
Darryl> this work? I'm using sarge currently. Is it worth it?
Unless 1.3.1 doesn't meet your needs,
> "Darryl" == Darryl L Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darryl> Is someone working to add a 1.4 JDK to debian?
The long story was already mentioned. I'll just add that adding
deb http://mirror.of.blackdown.org/pub/debian/ unstable main non-free
to /etc/apt/souces.list, followed by
Followups set to debian-java where this is a little more on topic.
> "Ian" == Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> gcj can compile java bytecode into native code. So
Ian> Architecture: all java libraries can be used for development
Ian> purposes without an interpreter.
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> I have used Sun's definition of "runtime environment"
Stefan> (i.e. core classes and JVM) in this case. And obviously
Stefan> the maintainers of classpath and libgcj* used the same
Stefan> definitions, otherwise thei
> "Per" == Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Per> Stefan Gybas wrote:
>> I have used Sun's definition of "runtime environment"
>> (i.e. core classes and JVM) in this case. And obviously the
>> maintainers of classpath and libgcj* used the same definitions,
>> otherwise
Followups set to debian-java where this is a little more on topic.
> "Ian" == Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> gcj can compile java bytecode into native code. So
Ian> Architecture: all java libraries can be used for development
Ian> purposes without an interpreter.
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> I have used Sun's definition of "runtime environment"
Stefan> (i.e. core classes and JVM) in this case. And obviously
Stefan> the maintainers of classpath and libgcj* used the same
Stefan> definitions, otherwise thei
> "Per" == Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Per> Stefan Gybas wrote:
>> I have used Sun's definition of "runtime environment"
>> (i.e. core classes and JVM) in this case. And obviously the
>> maintainers of classpath and libgcj* used the same definitions,
>> otherwise
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, here's my (hopefully) final question. I think I have
>> addressed everyone's concerns with this Depends line:
>>
>> Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine, kaffe | java-runtime,
>> java-common
Ola> If you chan
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> IMHO Java libraries should not have any dependencies on
Stefan> either a runtime or a virtual machine. The reason is
Stefan> simple: Let's say I have a Java library package in main
Stefan> (so it can be built with ji
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Libraries don't have to depend on java-virtual-machine
Stefan> since they are not run by end-users. For example, they can
Stefan> be used by Jikes to compile Java classes without an
Stefan> installed JVM (if the Debi
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, here's my (hopefully) final question. I think I have
>> addressed everyone's concerns with this Depends line:
>>
>> Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine, kaffe | java-runtime,
>> java-common
Ola> If you chan
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> IMHO Java libraries should not have any dependencies on
Stefan> either a runtime or a virtual machine. The reason is
Stefan> simple: Let's say I have a Java library package in main
Stefan> (so it can be built with ji
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Libraries don't have to depend on java-virtual-machine
Stefan> since they are not run by end-users. For example, they can
Stefan> be used by Jikes to compile Java classes without an
Stefan> installed JVM (if the Debi
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> I do not know that short form WTF. If they are installable
Ola> does not matter. If it is completely useless then it has to
Ola> depend on somekind of runtime at least. Just as with any
Ola> other dependencies. :)
WTF ->
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> I do not know that short form WTF. If they are installable
Ola> does not matter. If it is completely useless then it has to
Ola> depend on somekind of runtime at least. Just as with any
Ola> other dependencies. :)
WTF ->
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> This looks good if you only need a virtual machine and it
Ola> works with kaffe. But you most probably need a java1-runtime
Ola> to run it (not jus kaffe) so you should add that too (if you
Ola> need the runtime classes).
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> This looks good if you only need a virtual machine and it
Ola> works with kaffe. But you most probably need a java1-runtime
Ola> to run it (not jus kaffe) so you should add that too (if you
Ola> need the runtime classes).
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> Yes, thanks it works fine (altough the postinst try to
Sven> install the plugin to mozilla-cvs, which does not exist and
Sven> thus the postinst fails)
Hmm, I'll have to look at that.
Sven> Which GR ? The one about remo
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> Yes, thanks it works fine (altough the postinst try to
Sven> install the plugin to mozilla-cvs, which does not exist and
Sven> thus the postinst fails)
Hmm, I'll have to look at that.
Sven> Which GR ? The one about remo
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
Sven> complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
Sven> package as java-common ?
Someone else already metioned it but you needto add main to you
bacldow
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
Sven> complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
Sven> package as java-common ?
Someone else already metioned it but you needto add main to you
bacldow
> "Robert" == Robert Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Does anyone know what is the current state of j2se 1.4 or
Robert> 1.4.1 deb packages for x86?
I presume you've found them by now.
--
Stephen
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety des
> "Robert" == Robert Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Does anyone know what is the current state of j2se 1.4 or
Robert> 1.4.1 deb packages for x86?
I presume you've found them by now.
--
Stephen
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety des
> "Rupa" == Rupa Schomaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rupa> Umm.. I did.
Not very well apparently.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2002/debian-java-200210/msg00092.html>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2002/debian-java-200210/msg00102.html>
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
> "Rupa" == Rupa Schomaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rupa> Umm.. I did.
Not very well apparently.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2002/debian-java-200210/msg00092.html>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2002/debian-java-200210/msg00102.html>
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
--
To UNSUBS
> "Rupa" == Rupa Schomaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rupa> Suggestions?
Read the archives?
--
Stephen
"So if she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood."... "And
therefore?"... "A witch!"
> "Rupa" == Rupa Schomaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rupa> Suggestions?
Read the archives?
--
Stephen
"So if she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood."... "And
therefore?"... "A witch!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
> "Alban" == Alban Peignier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alban> .. :( I've got the same problem ! --
Did either of you upgrade to lic6 2.3.1 recently? All Blackdown j2se
< 1.4 beta are knonw to fail with libc6 >= 2.3.1. Downgrade libc6 or
install the 1.4 beta by hand for now.
--
Steph
Seeing as this comes up on a regular basis, I'll send the response to
debian-java as well
> "yoros" == yoros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
yoros> I don't find j2se-common package, where can I find it? I
yoros> think j2sdk1.3 and j2re1.3 are not well-packaged. If the
yoros> bu
Seeing as this comes up on a regular basis, I'll send the response to
debian-java as well
> "yoros" == yoros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
yoros> I don't find j2se-common package, where can I find it? I
yoros> think j2sdk1.3 and j2re1.3 are not well-packaged. If the
yoros> bu
> "J" == J R Westmoreland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
J> Where can I get .deb files for JAVA 1.4? J. R. Westmoreland
Right now, you can't. Once I finish packaging GGZ I'll update the
Blackdown mirrors with 1.4 debs unless Juergen beats me to it.
--
Stephen
"What would be the purpose o
> "J" == J R Westmoreland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
J> Where can I get .deb files for JAVA 1.4? J. R. Westmoreland
Right now, you can't. Once I finish packaging GGZ I'll update the
Blackdown mirrors with 1.4 debs unless Juergen beats me to it.
--
Stephen
"What would be the purpose
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> As I've already told, I'm planning to split xml-apis.jar
Stefan> (which is created by Xalan2) into a seperate package. But
Stefan> I'd like to move some Java packages to main first
Stefan> (including Ant and Xalan2)
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> As I've already told, I'm planning to split xml-apis.jar
Stefan> (which is created by Xalan2) into a seperate package. But
Stefan> I'd like to move some Java packages to main first
Stefan> (including Ant and Xalan2)
> "Thomas" == Thomas J Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> The debianised blackdown jdk. It's still at a version 1+
Thomas> years old and multiple releases have seen the light of
Thomas> day.
As of now (I just looked) jdk 1.3.1.02b is available in .deb form for
i386, powerpc
> "Thomas" == Thomas J Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> The debianised blackdown jdk. It's still at a version 1+
Thomas> years old and multiple releases have seen the light of
Thomas> day.
As of now (I just looked) jdk 1.3.1.02b is available in .deb form for
i386, powerp
> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Grzegorz> Blackdown released 1.4.1 beta - it may be good time to
Grzegorz> give them strict advice on how they should prepare
Grzegorz> packages for Debian.
Updated j2se packages are making their slow way onto the Black
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> Ah bugger, thanks for the reminder. There are newer debs
Stephen> for the Blackdown JDK, I've just not gotten them to the
Stephen> appropriate mirror source.
And I fin
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> Ah bugger, thanks for the reminder. There are newer debs
Stephen> for the Blackdown JDK, I've just not gotten them to the
Stephen> appropriate mirror source.
And I fin
> "Ross" == Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ross> Weirdly, the .deb is a lot older but appears to be a newer
Ross> version... Are there any other source for JDKs as .debs?
Ah bugger, thanks for the reminder. There are newer debs for the
Blackdown JDK, I've just not gotten them
> "Ross" == Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ross> Weirdly, the .deb is a lot older but appears to be a newer
Ross> version... Are there any other source for JDKs as .debs?
Ah bugger, thanks for the reminder. There are newer debs for the
Blackdown JDK, I've just not gotten the
> "Eric" == Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> Am I stupid or are these things tricky?
dpkg -Bi --force-overwrite java2-common
--
Stephen
"So if she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood."... "And
therefore?"... "A witch!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
