On 29/04/2010 17:11, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>
> Just for the record, in case we get other people interested in running a BoF
Actually, if there are people interested in such topics during DebCamp, we
can get a table and discuss. I think that it will be more effective, and
simpler to organize.
my 2
On Thursday 29 April 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 29/04/2010 04:26, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> > How do you feel about coordinating a BoF session on non-Java JVM-based
> > languages? That's a very quick to write submission and if Ramakrishnan
> > attends, we will have at least another person intereste
On 29/04/2010 04:26, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>
> How do you feel about coordinating a BoF session on non-Java JVM-based
> languages? That's a very quick to write submission and if Ramakrishnan
> attends, we will have at least another person interested in Clojure.
>
I never did that. So, I don't kn
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 27/04/2010 23:52, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> >> We should encourage related language (e.g. Clojure) talks as well.
> >
> > Indeed. I learned scala because I found about it through Debian :-) I'm
> > CC:ing the Scala maintainers to see if they feel lik
I've removed the security team.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> For now, the Scala Maintainers "team" is "me", and I won't have enough time
> to prepare a talk. But, I'll be at Debconf10 and I'll attend Java talks.
Everybody knows that Scala will be the next big thing :)
On 27/04/2010 23:52, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>
>> We should encourage related language (e.g. Clojure) talks as well.
>
> Indeed. I learned scala because I found about it through Debian :-) I'm
> CC:ing the Scala maintainers to see if they feel like giving a talk.
> (Groovy and clojure are Debian-Java
6 matches
Mail list logo
