Re: About java virtual dependencies and provides and the Java

2008-06-05 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hi, my email was the last one in the chain, but I don't consider it was a conclusive one. Thanks, Eric Eric Lavarde - Debian said: Hi, Michael Koch said: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:17:13PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: On Wed May 21 22:06, Michael Koch wrote: Debian supports only Java

Re: About java virtual dependencies and provides and the Java

2008-05-24 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hi, Michael Koch said: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:17:13PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: On Wed May 21 22:06, Michael Koch wrote: Debian supports only Java 5+ compatible runtimes in unstable. Almost compatible http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35020 (amongst others) Thats a

Re: About java virtual dependencies and provides and the Java Policy

2008-05-16 Thread Benjamin Mesing
Hello On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 13:27 +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote: Hi, browsing through the repositories to check some Java stuff, I find quite some confusion around virtual packages: I would also like to have this spelled out somewhere. Though policy's requirement, for virtual packages to

About java virtual dependencies and provides and the Java Policy

2008-05-11 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, browsing through the repositories to check some Java stuff, I find quite some confusion around virtual packages: icedtea-java7-jre provides: java-runtime, java2-runtime, java5-runtime, java6-runtime, java7-runtime icedtea-java7-jdk provides: java-sdk, java2-sdk, java5-sdk, java6-sdk,