On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:05:43PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hello Matthias, Michael,
may I express the opinion that you might not have read exactly what I've
written? (gosh, I'm so polite :-) )
My list contained all the software *depending* on at least one package
containing java in its
Hello Matthias, Michael,
may I express the opinion that you might not have read exactly what I've
written? (gosh, I'm so polite :-) )
My list contained all the software *depending* on at least one package
containing java in its name. As, according to the Java policy, all
packages _must_
Answering to myself, but here new list with the Source name...
Eric
depends_on_java.source.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:24:56PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Package: java-common
Version: 0.26
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
in section 2.4 Java libraries it should be specified that packages
containing such libraries should belong to the 'libs' section and not
to the 'devel' section.
Michael Koch writes:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:24:56PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Package: java-common
Version: 0.26
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
in section 2.4 Java libraries it should be specified that packages
containing such libraries should belong to the 'libs' section and
Hi,
number of binary packages is relatively easy if it doesn't need to be
precise:
$ aptitude -F '%20p %13s' search '~Djava' | wc -l
419
(all packages depending on packages containing java in their name; a
quick browsing through it tells me that it's a rather meaningful list)
Is there a
Eric Lavarde writes:
Hi,
number of binary packages is relatively easy if it doesn't need to be
precise:
$ aptitude -F '%20p %13s' search '~Djava' | wc -l
419
(all packages depending on packages containing java in their name; a
quick browsing through it tells me that it's a rather
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:59:04PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Eric Lavarde writes:
Hi,
number of binary packages is relatively easy if it doesn't need to be
precise:
$ aptitude -F '%20p %13s' search '~Djava' | wc -l
419
(all packages depending on packages containing java in
Package: java-common
Version: 0.26
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
in section 2.4 Java libraries it should be specified that packages
containing such libraries should belong to the 'libs' section and not
to the 'devel' section.
As Java libraries, to the difference of C libraries, are at
the same
9 matches
Mail list logo
