Re: Is AMD64 J2EE possible?

2005-08-20 Thread Dalibor Topic
Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 14:26 +, Dalibor Topic wrote: On Fedora's side, Andrew Haley is currently working on making JOnAS (Free Software J2EE implementation) work well on top of gcj/gij (Free Software runtime). gcj/gij runs on amd64, among several other architectures

Re: Is AMD64 J2EE possible?

2005-08-20 Thread Alan Woodland
Alan Woodland wrote: ... I think it was in libstdc++-glibc2.2 ... ^ should read libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is AMD64 J2EE possible?

2005-08-20 Thread Alan Woodland
Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: I can install and run the Sun JVM but I cannot install the j2EE sdk: ./sjsas_pe-8_1_02_2005Q2-linux.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory But I cannot find the package for libstd

Re: Is AMD64 J2EE possible?

2005-08-20 Thread Joost Kraaijeveld
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 14:26 +, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On Fedora's side, Andrew Haley is currently working on making JOnAS (Free > Software J2EE implementation) work well on top of gcj/gij (Free Software > runtime). gcj/gij runs on amd64, among several other architectures ;) > > Afaik, the work

Re: Is AMD64 J2EE possible?

2005-08-20 Thread Dalibor Topic
Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis.nl> writes: > > Hi, > > Is it possible to develop J2EE applications on an AMD64 using a > (non)free 64 bit environment? > > If so, is there a HOWTO or other form of documentation of how to set up > such environement? On Fedora's side, Andrew Haley is currently work

Is AMD64 J2EE possible?

2005-08-20 Thread Joost Kraaijeveld
Hi, Is it possible to develop J2EE applications on an AMD64 using a (non)free 64 bit environment? If so, is there a HOWTO or other form of documentation of how to set up such environement? TIA Joost -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con