Marcus Better wrote:
MrDemeanour wrote:
Hmm, to me it seems that oddly enough FSF considers it free:
That seems to mean that it's Debian-compatible
There is apparently no consensus on this point. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/08/msg00028.html
Thanks, that's a very helpful
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:15 +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > what do you mean by "out of the box"?
>
> Sorry for being unclear. Can the classpathx versions work as drop-in
> replacements for the Sun packages?
>
> (JBoss contains jar files for JavaMail 1.3.1 and JAF 1.0.2. I
MrDemeanour wrote:
>> Hmm, to me it seems that oddly enough FSF considers it free:
> That seems to mean that it's Debian-compatible
There is apparently no consensus on this point. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/08/msg00028.html
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Timo Juhani Lindfors writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:33:03PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > It certainly doesn't appear on the FSF list of free licences. It is,
>
> Hmm, to me it seems that oddly enough FSF considers it free:
>
> $ lynx -dump http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/l
Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:33:03PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
It certainly doesn't appear on the FSF list of free licences. It
is,
Hmm, to me it seems that oddly enough FSF considers it free:
$ lynx -dump http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html | grep
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:33:03PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> It certainly doesn't appear on the FSF list of free licences. It is,
Hmm, to me it seems that oddly enough FSF considers it free:
$ lynx -dump http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html | grep -A 5
"(CDDL)"
[101]Common
Tom Marble wrote:
> Why not use Sun's JavaMail and JAF?
It seems that the CDDL is not considered sufficiently free for Debian. At
least that's what I gathered from the lengthy discussions on mailing lists.
Or is there a decision to the opposite effect?
Anyway I would rather leave
will work out of the box?
> >
> > Why not use Sun's JavaMail and JAF? As of April they are now Free
> > software under the CDDL:
> > http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/index.jsp
>
> Since when did the CDDL equate to "Free"?
It certainly doe
Tom Marble wrote:
Marcus Better wrote:
the pkg-jboss project needs DFSG-free versions of Sun's JavaMail
and Java Activation Framework libraries. Can anyone tell me whether
the GNU versions (already in Debian) will work out of the box?
Why not use Sun's JavaMail and JAF? As of Apri
Marcus Better wrote:
> the pkg-jboss project needs DFSG-free versions of Sun's JavaMail and Java
> Activation Framework libraries. Can anyone tell me whether the GNU versions
> (already in Debian) will work out of the box?
Why not use Sun's JavaMail and JAF? As of Apri
Marcus Better writes:
> Hello,
>
> the pkg-jboss project needs DFSG-free versions of Sun's JavaMail and Java
> Activation Framework libraries. Can anyone tell me whether the GNU versions
> (already in Debian) will work out of the box?
what do you mean by "out of the box"? If they don't work, plea
Matthias Klose wrote:
> what do you mean by "out of the box"?
Sorry for being unclear. Can the classpathx versions work as drop-in
replacements for the Sun packages?
(JBoss contains jar files for JavaMail 1.3.1 and JAF 1.0.2. I intend to
replace them with the ones from classpathx.)
Marcus
--
Hello,
the pkg-jboss project needs DFSG-free versions of Sun's JavaMail and Java
Activation Framework libraries. Can anyone tell me whether the GNU versions
(already in Debian) will work out of the box?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
13 matches
Mail list logo
