Re: OpenJDK build attempts on the testing security infrastructure

2008-10-27 Thread Riku Voipio
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:50:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Build times are generally acceptable, with the exception of armel, which needed almost 45 hours. armel is at about 19 hours, so almost acceptable. However, in practice, this likely adds to the 45 hours of openjdk-6, resulting in

Re: OpenJDK build attempts on the testing security infrastructure

2008-10-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Riku Voipio schrieb: Also I notice the packages are built with ecj using the slowish gij interpreter. perhaps the package build could be made faster by using gcj precompiled ecj-gcj package? unfortunately this doesn't help; java-gcj-compat-dev already depends on ecj-gcj. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: OpenJDK build attempts on the testing security infrastructure

2008-10-26 Thread Matthias Klose
[sorry for not replying earler. please CC the package maintainer address, I don't read debian-java on a daily basis] Florian Weimer schrieb: Here are the results of building some OpenJDK packages on the security buildd infrastructure (with the test suites disabled). thanks for doing this.

Re: OpenJDK build attempts on the testing security infrastructure

2008-10-26 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 04:53:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: The s390 failure may be due to too little RAM allocated to the instance (on lxdebian.bfinv.de). tried to work around this prentending to have at least some amount of RAM (packages in experimental); the buildds may swap, but