Den 27.09.2019 10:15, skrev mer...@debian.org:
jline v2.14.6 is in Debian as libjline2-java, wouldn't this work?
FYI
I did a test of using jline 2.14.6 when running scala 2.12.0-M1 repl,
and it failed with NoSuchMethodError. Downloading and compiling jline
2.14.1, on the other hand, did wo
Hi Andrius,
Den 27.09.2019 10:15, skrev mer...@debian.org:
I have managed to get around Scala FTBFS problem [1] for now, will
continue looking into your script.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941211
Are you trying to compile scala 2.11.12 from the source debian package
Hi Thomas,
I have managed to get around Scala FTBFS problem [1] for now, will
continue looking into your script.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941211
On 2019-09-27 02:07, Thomas Finneid wrote:
> 1- The scala library depenencies are hardcoded, so it doesnt find the
> corre
Den 26.09.2019 21:29, skrev Thomas Finneid:
I am currently working on making the script work in debian unstable,
using system installed packages for jdk, scala 2.11.12, ant, jline etc.
I will probably have something workign by the end of the evening.
Hi again,
I have updated the scala bu
On 26.09.2019 16:54, mer...@debian.org wrote:
I have cloned your repo and started playing around. AFAIK, your build
script requires jars built from earlier version of Scala (akka-actor.jar
and friends). Thus I've tried building Scala and ran into a FTBFS [1]. I
will have to figure it out before
Hi Thomas,
On 2019-09-25 23:03, Thomas Finneid wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in answering, I'm on daddy-leave so time is
> scarce. (and sorry for the long mail... :) )
Thank you for finding some time to contribute to packaging Scala/sbt! :)
> I have some more good news :) After battling with my o
Hi Andrius
Sorry for the delay in answering, I'm on daddy-leave so time is scarce.
(and sorry for the long mail... :) )
I have some more good news :) After battling with my own and other
demons I have managed to create a shell script for compiling Scala
2.12.0-M1. The experiences from that c
Hi Frédéric and Thomas,
Sorry for the delay. I must admit I wasn't aware the dogfooding problem
is so difficult to avoid.
On 2019-08-17 07:53, Thomas Finneid wrote:
> The good news is that after talking with some of the maintainers of
> Sbt and Scala, they would be very interrested in getting a s
Den 14.08.2019 11:54, skrev Frédéric Bonnard:
But for sbt, as far as I remember, you cannot just javac * and scalac *
(as for the other simple sbt- packages : see d/rules of
sbt-launcher-interface, sbt-serialization etc), because pieces of the
source code is generated during the build process an
Hi,
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:25:19 +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> On 2019-08-08 17:48, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > I don't think there is a repository yet. I've just created an empty one
> > on Salsa if that helps.
>
> Thanks - I'll push once I have something.
the point is that the current packagi
On 2019-08-08 17:48, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I don't think there is a repository yet. I've just created an empty one
> on Salsa if that helps.
Thanks - I'll push once I have something.
Best,
Andrius
Le 08/08/2019 à 12:37, mer...@debian.org a écrit :
> Thanks, I'll give it a look. By the way, the source package does not
> have VCS-* fields, neither it is on Salsa. Do you know where its
> packaging repository is?
I don't think there is a repository yet. I've just created an empty one
on Salsa
Hi Emmanuel,
On 2019-08-08 10:33, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> sbt is in sid but hasn't been bootstrapped properly yet, it still uses
> libraries not built from sources. Nobody is actively working on it, feel
> free to give it a try.
Thanks, I'll give it a look. By the way, the source package does not
Hi Andrius,
sbt is in sid but hasn't been bootstrapped properly yet, it still uses
libraries not built from sources. Nobody is actively working on it, feel
free to give it a try.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 07/08/2019 à 13:32, mer...@debian.org a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am writing regarding the status of
Hello,
I am writing regarding the status of sbt Debian package. Version 0.13.13
is in sid, but it had never entered testing. Version 1.3.0-RC3 has
already been released, are there any plans to update the package? If
not, I would be willing to try my luck.
Best wishes,
Andrius
15 matches
Mail list logo
