Bug#827998: RM: jenkins-dom4j -- ROM; No longer used

2016-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Please remove the jenkins-dom4j package, it has been left over after the removal of Jenkins and is no longer used. Thank you, Emmanuel Bourg

Re: RFS: dom4j/1.6.1+dfsg.3-1

2013-04-19 Thread tony mancill
On 04/18/2013 10:54 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 19/04/2013 06:44, tony mancill a écrit : > >> Uploaded, but as the next consecutive Debian revision because the >> it's the same upstream source version - that is: >> dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg.2-7 > > Actually I changed the content of the orig tarball, th

Re: RFS: dom4j/1.6.1+dfsg.3-1

2013-04-19 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/04/2013 06:44, tony mancill a écrit : > Uploaded, but as the next consecutive Debian revision because the > it's the same upstream source version - that is: > dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg.2-7 Actually I changed the content of the orig tarball, that's why I had to use dfsg.3. This version has more class

Re: RFS: dom4j/1.6.1+dfsg.3-1

2013-04-18 Thread tony mancill
On 04/16/2013 04:42 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dom4j/dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg.3-1.dsc Uploaded, but as the next consecutive Debian revision because the it's the same upstream source version - that is: dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg.2-7 Cheers, tony signa

Re: RFS: jenkins-dom4j/1.6.1-hudson-3-2 - [UPLOADED]

2013-04-18 Thread tony mancill
On 04/16/2013 08:35 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi, > > I also updated the Jenkins variant of dom4j with similar changes: > > * Removed the dependency on backport-util-concurrent > * Update Standards-Version: 3.9.4 (no changes) > * Enabled XSD support by adding a depe

RFS: jenkins-dom4j/1.6.1-hudson-3-2

2013-04-16 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi, I also updated the Jenkins variant of dom4j with similar changes: * Removed the dependency on backport-util-concurrent * Update Standards-Version: 3.9.4 (no changes) * Enabled XSD support by adding a dependency on libmsv-java * Updated debian/copyright to comply with the Machine

RFS: dom4j/1.6.1+dfsg.3-1

2013-04-16 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi, After removing the dependency on backport-util-concurrent for ehcache I started looking for other packages with this obsolete dependency. The package for dom4j falls into this category. That was also the opportunity to refresh the package. The XSD feature was disabled due to a

Re: RFS: jenkins-dom4j 1.6.1-hudson-3-1 (new)

2011-09-12 Thread James Page
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 21:53 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > Sponsored. Thankyou! -- James Page Ubuntu Server Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: jenkins-dom4j 1.6.1-hudson-3-1 (new)

2011-09-09 Thread tony mancill
Sponsored. Cheers, tony On 08/30/2011 02:50 PM, James Page wrote: > Hi Team > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "jenkins-dom4j". > > * Package name: jenkins-dom4j > Version : 1.6.1-hudson-3-1 > * URL : http://github.

RFS: jenkins-dom4j 1.6.1-hudson-3-1 (new)

2011-08-30 Thread James Page
Hi Team I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "jenkins-dom4j". * Package name: jenkins-dom4j Version : 1.6.1-hudson-3-1 * URL : http://github.com/jenkinsci/dom4j * License : DOM4J Section : java The package appears to be lintian c

Re: Why does SVN contain sources for tomcat5.5 and dom4j

2009-04-17 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Onkar Shinde wrote: > So are you going to remove these files from svn? They are used to build the packages. But feel free if you want to convert back to the usual layout. (dom4j is quite inactive upstream, I think, and tomcat5.5 should be going a

Re: Why does SVN contain sources for tomcat5.5 and dom4j

2009-04-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Marcus Better wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Onkar Shinde wrote: > >> and dom4j on pkg-java svn checkout are taking up approx 85MB and 82MB >> of space. These folders contain source and/or documentation

Re: Why does SVN contain sources for tomcat5.5 and dom4j

2009-04-16 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Onkar Shinde wrote: > and dom4j on pkg-java svn checkout are taking up approx 85MB and 82MB > of space. These folders contain source and/or documentation for > respective packages. > Is this intentional? Yes. That was an experi

Why does SVN contain sources for tomcat5.5 and dom4j

2009-04-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, While doing some disk cleanup today I found out that folders tomcat5.5 and dom4j on pkg-java svn checkout are taking up approx 85MB and 82MB of space. These folders contain source and/or documentation for respective packages. Is this intentional? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: dom4j packaging

2006-10-04 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Better wrote: > Marcus Better wrote: > >> I've finished packaging of JaxMe 2 (based on Wolfgang Baer's work), expect >> it to be uploaded soon. I will now look at dom4j. > > Hmm, turns out that we have to u

Re: dom4j packaging

2006-10-03 Thread Marcus Better
Marcus Better wrote: > I've finished packaging of JaxMe 2 (based on Wolfgang Baer's work), expect > it to be uploaded soon. I will now look at dom4j. Hmm, turns out that we have to update jaxen to 1.1 first, Wolfgang also started doing that. It gets really messy because jaxen use

Re: dom4j packaging

2006-10-03 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Better wrote: > Hi developers, > > I've finished packaging of JaxMe 2 (based on Wolfgang Baer's work), expect > it to be uploaded soon. I will now look at dom4j. Thanks! - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellu

Re: dom4j packaging

2006-10-03 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, Marcus Better wrote: Hi developers, I've finished packaging of JaxMe 2 (based on Wolfgang Baer's work), expect it to be uploaded soon. I will now look at dom4j. Eric: what is the status of xsdlib? Did you manage to sort out the license issues? Nope, the guys from Sun were h

dom4j packaging

2006-10-03 Thread Marcus Better
Hi developers, I've finished packaging of JaxMe 2 (based on Wolfgang Baer's work), expect it to be uploaded soon. I will now look at dom4j. Eric: what is the status of xsdlib? Did you manage to sort out the license issues? Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: dom4j

2003-04-30 Thread Peter Kahle
(originally sent privately, sent to list for posterity) xml-apis.jar was split out of the xalan.jar at some point. On my sid system with libxalan2-java 2.4.1.1 installed, xml-apis.jar is included. P On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 04:53, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: > Hello. > > I've got a trouble with ht

dom4j

2003-04-30 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
Hello. I've got a trouble with http://www.dom4j.org/ since it ships some (actually, many) "standard" xml jars with it, even it will be nice to use debian's ones. Another trouble is that classes in debs seems to be packed in another way than it was intended by upstreams: first thing I stumbled on i