Re: openjdk-9: FYI: Swing generics changes

2017-08-25 Thread solo-debianbugs
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 08:29:07PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Would you be willing to file bug reports for all Java 9 issues > identified by you? I suggest to use severity normal for now, we can > always raise the severity later. I believe this would be helpful to > start working on some of

Re: openjdk-9: FYI: Swing generics changes

2017-08-23 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, thanks for your continued analysis of the Java 9 situation. Am 23.08.2017 um 00:42 schrieb Chris West: [...] > This really doesn't feel like the kind of thing we should patch, and is > rather ugly to fix in each package (although essentially simple). Sadness. :( Agreed. Ok, it's too late

Re: openjdk-9: FYI: Swing generics changes

2017-08-22 Thread Vincent Privat
That's clearly too late for Java 9, I'm afraid your bug report will not be accepted. To avoid detecting this kind of breakage so late in the development cycle, maybe the Debian Java team could join the Quality Outreach [1]. There are a lot of Java open source projects out there, reporting

openjdk-9: FYI: Swing generics changes

2017-08-22 Thread Chris West
As I can't think of anywhere else to complain... I've been looking at Java 9 build logs again[1]. These packages are broken by the addition of generics to a small number of swing classes: * electric * freeplane * jajuk * jsymphonic * libjaudiotagger * sweethome3d * zeroc-ice There may