On Monday 18 February 2002 17:54, Putz Akos wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2002 19:16, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> > Putz:
> >
> > I am wondering if you are using an openoffice deb? Have looked around a
> > little but do not see anything.
>
> Hi!
> (Ok, I know it's a bit confusing, but I'm a
On Monday 18 February 2002 19:16, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> Putz:
>
> I am wondering if you are using an openoffice deb? Have looked around a
> little but do not see anything.
Hi!
(Ok, I know it's a bit confusing, but I'm a hungarian guy. I know, it's
strange, but in Hungary the first name
Hi,
On Monday 18 February 2002 20:58, Robert Tilley wrote:
> Should there ever be more than one kde-init process running at a time?
Yes. There should be only one main kdeinit process per KDE instance (which
usually means 1, unless you run e.g. KDE2 + 3 in parallel), but several
others for kdein
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 02:58:51PM -0500, Robert Tilley wrote:
> Should there ever be more than one kde-init process running at a time?
--
Yes. I guess it's some kind of hack to make KDE apps load faster:
http://www.derkarl.org/linking.phtml
You'll want to look at section 4 in particu
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:33:28 +0100 (CET) Gregor Zeitlinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is there any debian based KDE distribution. I think it would be a great
> thing, because it would combine the power of apt-get with the ease of use
> of KDE. You should even be able to get all KDE packages and
Should there ever be more than one kde-init process running at a time?
Robert
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Alan Chandler wrote:
> Its only me, because I want to help with some coding that means I need
> to be4 on the bleeding edge that means I must build from source.
me too, but even if you don't want that debian is still more complicated
than other distros - that's my impression fr
On Monday 18 Feb 2002 10:28 am, Gregor Zeitlinger wrote:
>
> Ok, that means I messed up somewhere. Doesn't really surprise me, as I'm
> new to debian, and I'm getting the impression that you have to be an
> expert to install it but even a M$ user can update it
Building KDE from sources isn't t
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:28:40AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> I'm willing to do an NMU if there really is a dpendency problem (and Chris
> doesn't object) but is there really a problem?
>
> I have libglib1.3-12 installed and I was also able to install the kde
> package without any dependency
On Monday 18 February 2002 09:31 am, Putz Akos wrote:
> Ok, I've found the solution : if the KDE panel is on the left, OO and SO
> segfault. But if it is at bottom, everything works OK. Probably it is not a
> KDE bug, but who knows.
Putz:
I am wondering if you are using an openoffice deb? Ha
Ok, I've found the solution : if the KDE panel is on the left, OO and SO
segfault. But if it is at bottom, everything works OK. Probably it is not a
KDE bug, but who knows.
--
Putz Ákos Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 18 February 2002 09:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned
[...]
> 6) Find another maintainer who can fix the metapackage, etc.
Just as Ben, Derek and Daniel, I'm really getting annoyed
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:28:40AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> I'm willing to do an NMU if there really is a dpendency problem (and Chris
> doesn't object) but is there really a problem?
>
> I have libglib1.3-12 installed and I was also able to install the kde
> package without any dependency
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok
> ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned absence
> kde metapackage in Sid doesn't install
> fails on libkmid - libkmid: Depends: libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12)
> fails on libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12) is not available
> fails
On Monday 18 February 2002 12:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> What's best quick fix for broken kde metapackage?
> What's the best long term fix for this?
> Do we need someone to do an NMU of the kde metapackage?
>
> There are quick fixes, and long term proper ways to do things.
> Right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2002 05:02 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Ok, since I can't get the 'kde' metapackage in Sid to install, I did a
> apt-cache show kde(I think)
> and saw a bunch of depends and suggests.
>
> So, to get as much of the functionali
??? 18 ??? 2002 11:33, Gregor Zeitlinger ???:
> A key feature would be a KDE frontent to deselect. Is there something the
> like already?
Think it is called kpackage:
Description: Software package tool for KDE
This is a frontend to both .rpm and .deb package formats. It allows y
Em Seg, 2002-02-18 às 07:33, Gregor Zeitlinger escreveu:
> Is there any debian based KDE distribution.
Yes both in woody and sid
> I think it would be a great
> thing, because it would combine the power of apt-get with the ease of use
> of KDE. You should even be able to get all KDE packages and
Is there any debian based KDE distribution. I think it would be a great
thing, because it would combine the power of apt-get with the ease of use
of KDE. You should even be able to get all KDE packages and all the
GNU/Linux stuff that is required on one cd. Everything else could be
installed manual
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I couldn't find any - I just built the whole of kde from source (took all
> evening and all night Friday)
>
> [and I didn't fail trying to build kdelibs!]
Ok, that means I messed up somewhere. Doesn't really surprise me, as I'm
new to debian, and I'm ge
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 02:00:04AM -0800, Derek Gladding wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2002 01:36 am, ben wrote:
> > On Monday 18 February 2002 12:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Ok
> > > ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned
> > > absence
> >
> > [stuff]
>
> Seconde
On Monday 18 February 2002 01:36 am, ben wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2002 12:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ok
> > ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned
> > absence
>
> it's great that you've taken such an interest in helping the
> maintainers but you seem to have de
On Monday 18 February 2002 12:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok
> ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned absence
it's great that you've taken such an interest in helping the maintainers but
you seem to have developed an attitude of scorn that really seems
unjustified. e
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made a new kdelibs 2.2.2-12 upload tonight. It changes quite a bit.
> I will be uploading new packages for kdebase and others asap. I have
> been quite busy with my CS classes recently, but I hope that will calm
> down soon.
Hi, Glad to see you ba
Ok
ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned absence
kde metapackage in Sid doesn't install
fails on libkmid - libkmid: Depends: libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12)
fails on libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12) is not available
fails on kdebase-audiolibs
fails on libkmid or libkmid-alsa
I made a new kdelibs 2.2.2-12 upload tonight. It changes quite a bit.
I will be uploading new packages for kdebase and others asap. I have
been quite busy with my CS classes recently, but I hope that will calm
down soon.
Chris
26 matches
Mail list logo
