That looks like it is a system tray icon for a gnome application because of
the different colored background, for some reason it didn't load properly.
Figure out what gnome applications (or gtk for that matter) that you are
using, that should narrow the source of it down a bit for you.
-Jared
On Wed, 12 May 2004 14:25:29 -0700
Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have this icon, kind-of, on my panel. It's the pale box between the
> Korganizer and Kopete icons in the attached jpg file. I can't figure
> out what it is. It doesn't respond to any mouse actions. Can some
> help m
I have this icon, kind-of, on my panel. It's the pale box between the
Korganizer and Kopete icons in the attached jpg file. I can't figure
out what it is. It doesn't respond to any mouse actions. Can some help
me figure out what it is and how to either activate or remove it?
The system is runn
Maybe he should remove the rubbish on his table? =8)
Sönke
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 19:17, Sean J. Fraley wrote:
> And we can't see the text of you e-mail.
"Sean J. Fraley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And we can't see the text of you e-mail.
But that's OK, not like we care about spam...
--
Paul Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.
pgpo9VuyGnvRZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And we can't see the text of you e-mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAolxK+vaNXagSMEIRAuaRAKCsCXOJ5W4DcwOnt4lu0eyvUBDQTQCghZCy
NFuSgjm8O6F2G3ZYW/PYy2w=
=bZB5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Monday 10 May 2004 12:06 pm, Antiphon wrote:
> > If I get it right 0007 would lead to denie access to anyone not beeing
> > user or in the group of the file, and giving full access to the file for
> > user and group? That would be what I want!
>
> No. 0007 means that anyone can write to it who
* Silvan [Wed, 12 May 2004 03:06:33 -0400]:
> Will the camera move depending on which of these strange little holes I stick
> the plug into? The hardest part of the process I so vaguely described was
> determining which of sda1 through sda15 had the camera on it.
if you have some time, you c
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 02:10 am, Caveman wrote:
> mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/camera
>
> Where /dev/sda1 will be the device unless you have scsi disks or another
> usb storage device already connected. and /mnt/camera will be the folder.
I think it was /dev/sda8 actually, but maybe I'm mistaken. Is ho
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 08:13 am, Bart Dorsey wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2004 11:17 am, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > do with the "sticky bit", about which I wouldn't mind reading. It
> > seems that in most references that I have seen they don't talk about
> > it much.
>
> Okay, here goes ;) you aske
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/camera
Where /dev/sda1 will be the device unless you have scsi disks or another usb
storage device already connected. and /mnt/camera will be the folder.
Caveman
On Tue, 11 May 2004 06:26 pm, Silvan wrote:
> I've never used USB for anything, even though I've had it for yea
11 matches
Mail list logo
