Georg,
works for me. I am just wondering why konqueror does not assume a reasonable
default. I have the impression that firefox manages that somehow.
Many thanks,
Rainer
Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 23:52 schrieb Georg Prager:
> > Any hint how I get a better readable printout?
>
> The only worka
On Monday 21 February 2005 20:28, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Monday 21 February 2005 19:42, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > %U means URL list, %u means single URL.
>
> And programs in the tree should always use %U, because you cannot know how
> many urls another program passes along.
The tree
> Any hint how I get a better readable printout?
>
The only workaround I know, is to make the konqueror window smaller. Works for
me. When konqueror ist maximized I get the same result as you.
pgpxtjEGf5Vff.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I noticed that I get frequently tiny fonts in printouts from konqueror. An
example page which prints with tiny fonts is
http://news.com.com/2102-7344_3-5582945.html?tag=st.util.print
The result I get is in
http://alzental-castle.de/print.pdf
Any hint how I get a better readable printou
On Mon, 2005-21-02 at 11:41 -0400, Derek Broughton wrote:
> On Monday 21 February 2005 10:44, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> > - Well I am not 100% sure, but I feel like I remember that after selecting
> > kdelibs and kdebase, also selecting arts will not install any further
> > packages, bes
On Mon, 2005-21-02 at 20:23 +0100, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Monday 21 February 2005 18:43, Derek Broughton wrote:
> > lol. if the people who _like_ aptitude don't realize this, how do you ever
> > convert people? (I knew about F, but couldn't seem to get it to work,
> > either, so ma
Derek Broughton wrote:
> I've been using kpackage as long as it's existed, and it's never been
> that. If the packages it's using are debs, it's _strictly_ a front end for
> apt-get.
Sorry, I did not write it clearly -- what I meant is that KPackage (IMHO,
correct me if I am wrong) does not unders
On Monday 21 February 2005 20:23, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> The above option might not always be what you want. Sometimes fill hold is
> what's needed.
That should be 'full hold'..
Anders
--
- Debian/Unstable - KDE 3.3.2 - KMail 1.7.2 -
On Monday 21 February 2005 19:42, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> %U means URL list, %u means single URL.
And programs in the tree should always use %U, because you cannot know how
many urls another program passes along.
When you type it manually you can usually just use %u.
Anders
--
- Debian/Unstab
On Monday 21 February 2005 18:50, Derek Broughton wrote:
> I've been using kpackage as long as it's existed, and it's never been that.
> If the packages it's using are debs, it's _strictly_ a front end for
> apt-get. If the packages are rpms, it's a front end for rpm (?? not sure
> about that - _n
On Monday 21 February 2005 18:43, Derek Broughton wrote:
> lol. if the people who _like_ aptitude don't realize this, how do you ever
> convert people? (I knew about F, but couldn't seem to get it to work,
> either, so maybe my problem is with the way I'm trying to do upgrades).
I was this '' cl
On Monday 21 February 2005 14:18, Theo Schmidt wrote:
> Am Montag 21 Februar 2005 18:14 schrieb Matej Cepl:
> ...
> > considering kpackage -- yeah, I would love to have some kind of
> > kAptitude,
> ...
>
> I am thoroughly happy with Synaptic, even though it doesn't solve the
> meta-package problem
On Monday 21 February 2005 09:32, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> The problem is, it seems, that kde is somehow unable to see the options
> that should be passed along when starting the application, so it misses the
> important %U option that many applications need.
Hmm, when you use the item
Am Montag 21 Februar 2005 18:14 schrieb Matej Cepl:
...
> considering kpackage -- yeah, I would love to have some kind of kAptitude,
...
I am thoroughly happy with Synaptic, even though it doesn't solve the
meta-package problem either. At least it prominently tells you before
removing all of KDE
On Monday 21 February 2005 13:14, Matej Cepl wrote:
> considering kpackage -- yeah, I would love to have some kind of kAptitude,
> but IMHO (and I haven't tested for couple of years) kpackage is just a
> general tool which doesn't make difference (and does not take into
> consideration) between rp
On Monday 21 February 2005 12:15, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Anders Ellenshøj Andersen [Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:12:33 +0100]:
> > Get the old package from whatever source is available. Install it with
> > dpkg -i packagename. Start aptitude, find the package and press =. That's
> > it. The package is mar
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:18:51PM -0400, Derek Broughton wrote:
> It's a really hard sell to convince people to move to something like
> aptitude when what they've got isn't broken...
aptitude does have a command-line interface too, very like apt-get
and apt-cache. Sadly, it still has the infe
On Mon, 2005-21-02 at 17:26 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 17:03 schrieb Derek Broughton:
> >
> > I would think so. I can't see it being a big bonus that I have to go to a
> > (quite unintuitive) curses based interface instead of using the
> > command-line (apt-get) or
Derek Broughton wrote:
> I would think so. I can't see it being a big bonus that I have to go to a
> (quite unintuitive) curses based interface instead of using the
> command-line (apt-get) or GUI (kpackage) interfaces I'm used to, though.
considering apt-get -- life is just too complicated to be
Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 17:03 schrieb Derek Broughton:
> Perhaps. It should, in any case, attempt to maintain compatibility with
> dpkg.
Hmm, does it really? It runs apt-get which runs dpkg. If you use a dpkg hold,
it should hold the package in that case although I am not sure if
--force-ho
On Monday 21 February 2005 11:32, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 14:30 schrieb Derek Broughton:
> > I tried [aptitude] once and discovered it also
> > ignores my package holds).
> >
> > But for the purposes of the OP, if you want to get rid of, e.g., kteatime
> > but keep k
* Anders Ellenshøj Andersen [Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:12:33 +0100]:
> Get the old package from whatever source is available. Install it with dpkg
> -i
> packagename. Start aptitude, find the package and press =. That's it. The
> package is marked as held and will not be updated.
Just FYI, if you
On Monday 21 February 2005 16:41, Derek Broughton wrote:
> I don't think so. I believe it ignores holds made with dpkg, but provides
> much more flexible management within itself. So, I play with sid - with
> daily upgrades - and every now and then get burned by a bad package. I
> back it out, re
On Monday 21 February 2005 10:44, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
>
> What are you trying to say here?
>
> That aptitude is shit?
>
Yeah! Wanna make something of it :-)
No, seriously, it probably works, but it _doesn't_ play well with apt-get.
> - It's not, it rocks! And Aptitude keeps my hol
Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 14:30 schrieb Derek Broughton:
> Well, no. You can remove any of those packages and they in turn will
> remove kde-core (using apt-get or kpackage - if you use aptitude and it
> removes all a metapackage's dependencies, I can only say it's a pathetic
> excuse for a pack
On Monday 21 February 2005 14:30, Derek Broughton wrote:
> > You know, you are probably right, though I believe you actually can't
> > avoid installing it. IIRC arts is just a meta package for basic
> > components of arts. All these are already installed by either kdebase,
> > kdelibs or by dependa
Ah, I understand. Since the beginning, I have been using dselect. I
realize many people consider it pase', but it works for me.
Now, if I could figure out who it was who decided to change the
"continue" key in dselect from "space" to "return" for Woody, and has
recently changed it back to "spac
On Monday 21 February 2005 06:52, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Monday 21 February 2005 10:58, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > > Yes. And for a barebones kde install, you need kdebase, kdelibs and
> > > arts.
> >
> > arts is not absolutely necessary...
>
> You know, you are probably right, thoug
Hi
I am currently loading debian with squid. I would like to know which is the
best program
To load to derive stats from as far as web browsing is concerned. I believe
that calamaris will provide all this. Are there any other suggestions ?
The information in this e-mail is confidential and priv
On Monday 21 February 2005 10:58, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Yes. And for a barebones kde install, you need kdebase, kdelibs and arts.
>
> arts is not absolutely necessary...
You know, you are probably right, though I believe you actually can't avoid
installing it. IIRC arts is just a meta packag
On Thursday 17 February 2005 03:06, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> Try:
> o first reboot ;)
> o grep in your home .* and in /etc/ where the bogus LC_ALL is set.
> (then find and pester the orignator with a bug report ;)
Ehm, could you kindly suggest the command to enter? I am not familiar with the
grep
Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 09:35 schrieb Anders Ellenshøj Andersen:
> On Monday 21 February 2005 08:37, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
> > Curt Howland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 19 February 2005 08:54, Hendrik Sattler was heard to say:
> > > > Who cares for the meta packages? They contain
On Monday 21 February 2005 08:37, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
> Curt Howland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 February 2005 08:54, Hendrik Sattler was heard to say:
> > > Who cares for the meta packages? They contain not files and can be
> > > removed without any problem.
> >
> > I've seen res
From what you write below I am pretty sure it's the bug I mentioned that is
causing this trouble.
When you select open with, and type in the application you want to use
manually, instead of selecting it from the tree, then everything will work as
expectied. It sounds like that is what you did w
34 matches
Mail list logo
