Diederik de Haas
> On Sunday 17 March 2013 23:50:14 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> > Thanks
>
> Sorry. Won't bother you again.
You didn't bother me, so don't worry.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 17 March 2013 23:50:14 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> Thanks
Sorry. Won't bother you again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303172358.0
Diederik de Haas
> On Sunday 17 March 2013 17:57:28 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> > But what about once you have upgraded to the qt-kde.d.n? Keeping the
> > experimental lines in sources.list: do you still need to have the
> > packages on hold to prevent an undesired upgrade to the 3.0.0 p
On Sunday 17 March 2013 17:57:28 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> But what about once you have upgraded to the qt-kde.d.n? Keeping the
> experimental lines in sources.list: do you still need to have the packages
> on hold to prevent an undesired upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages in
> experimental
Martin Steigerwald
> Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
> > Martin Steigerwald
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Thanks for packaging digikam 3.0.
> > >
> > > Is there any way to resolve the following without messing my system up?
> > >
> > > I read:
> > >* digikam 3.0
Hi!
I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems
José and others work on KDE SC 4.10.
Are any of these already in a testable state? I may be inclined to build
some during the free week after the coming week.
Anyway, keep up the good work.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Stei
Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
> Martin Steigerwald
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Thanks for packaging digikam 3.0.
> >
> > Is there any way to resolve the following without messing my system up?
> >
> > I read:
> >* digikam 3.0.0 uses features from unreleased kdegraphi
7 matches
Mail list logo