On Sunday 16 February 2014 13:30:21 Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sunday 16 February 2014 13:03:37 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 15. Februar 2014, 11:59:38 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> > > Am Samstag, 15. Februar 2014, 09:58:11 schrieb Marco Valli:
> > > > Installs and works smooth
Sorry - this isn't strictly a Debian KDE question, but I figure somebody
here will know something about this.
In the latest KDE Commit-Digest (Issue 322, dated 12th.Jan.2014) [1] the
following very terse and (to me) bizarre statement is made :
"KDM has been removed ... KDM goes the way of the D
On Monday, February 17, 2014 04:13:11 PM Nick Boyce wrote:
> Sorry - this isn't strictly a Debian KDE question, but I figure somebody
> here will know something about this.
>
> In the latest KDE Commit-Digest (Issue 322, dated 12th.Jan.2014) [1] the
> following very terse and (to me) bizarre state
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:27:42 -0600 y...@marupa.net wrote:
> On Monday, February 17, 2014 04:13:11 PM Nick Boyce wrote:
>
> > In the latest KDE Commit-Digest
> >
> > "KDM has been removed ... KDM goes the way of the Dodo."
> >
> > A quick bit of googling for such terms as "KDM removal [why]"
>
On 2014-02-17, Nick Boyce wrote:
> Thanks, I guess that explains it ... well mostly ... I had thought that
> Wayland was just an optional alternative to X for the major desktops for
> a long time to come, but that article seems to state that it'll be
> Wayland or nothing, sometime "soon". Anyway,
Hi!
Is it possible for kde-telepathy(-call-ui) to depend on the 1.0 libraries of
gstreamer instead of 0.1?
Cheers,
Diederik
--
GPG: 0x138E41915C7EFED6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday, February 17, 2014 09:38:47 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2014-02-17, Nick Boyce wrote:
> > Thanks, I guess that explains it ... well mostly ... I had thought that
> > Wayland was just an optional alternative to X for the major desktops for
> > a long time to come, but that article seems t
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:20:24 -0600 y...@marupa.net wrote:
> On Monday, February 17, 2014 09:38:47 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On 2014-02-17, Nick Boyce wrote:
> > > Thanks, I guess that explains it ... well mostly ... I had
> > > thought that Wayland was just an optional alternative to X for
> > >
On 2014-02-18, Nick Boyce wrote:
> agree - but won't X's ability to carry display traffic from one machine
> to another be sorely missed by some people ? I seem to recall reading
> something about shims for that, but I wonder quite how well it would
> work (more reading to do).
The way Qt draws
9 matches
Mail list logo
