Would you not say that xfs is preferred over ext4? In benchmarks and recovery
exercises, it appears to come out ahead for performance and recovery.
The negative aspect of deploying xfs is that once the partition size is set,
you cannot add or reduce it's size without a reformat of that partition
On Monday, 12 September 2016 11:20:24 CEST Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> Would you not say that xfs is preferred over ext4? In benchmarks and
> recovery exercises, it appears to come out ahead for performance and
> recovery. The negative aspect of deploying xfs is that once the partition
> size is
2 matches
Mail list logo
