Package: src:okular
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: aeru...@aerusso.net
Dear Maintainer,
I've taken a stab at updating the packaging for okular [1]. I'd
very much like to get okular 20.12.0 ASAP, since it fixes some
painful regressions for me.
Best,
Antonio Russo
[1]
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 23:03:51 +0100
Source: print-manager
Architecture: source
Version: 4:20.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By: Aurélien COUDERC
print-manager_20.12.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
print-manager_20.12.0-1.dsc
print-manager_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz
print-manager_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz.asc
print-manager_20.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz
print-manager_20.12.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 23:35:15 +0100
Source: dragon
Architecture: source
Version: 4:20.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By: Aurélien COUDERC
Changes:
dragon_20.12.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dragon_20.12.0-1.dsc
dragon_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz
dragon_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz.asc
dragon_20.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz
dragon_20.12.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 23:00:36 +0100
Source: ktouch
Architecture: source
Version: 4:20.12.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By: Aurélien COUDERC
Changes:
Simon Frei - 10.12.20, 18:46:16 CET:
> I understand the question as why is debian targeting 5.20 for the next
> stable instead of 5.18 LTS. The answer is simple: LTS means 1.5 year
> of support, maybe more [1]. That's not long enough for the debian
> release cycle: 5.18 was at the beginning of
ktouch_20.12.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ktouch_20.12.0-2.dsc
ktouch_20.12.0-2.debian.tar.xz
ktouch_20.12.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:06:30 +0100
Source: ktouch
Architecture: source
Version: 4:20.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By: Aurélien COUDERC
Changes:
ktouch_20.12.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ktouch_20.12.0-1.dsc
ktouch_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz
ktouch_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz.asc
ktouch_20.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz
ktouch_20.12.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:45:15 +0100
Source: kde-spectacle
Architecture: source
Version: 20.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By: Aurélien COUDERC
kde-spectacle_20.12.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kde-spectacle_20.12.0-1.dsc
kde-spectacle_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz
kde-spectacle_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz.asc
kde-spectacle_20.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz
kde-spectacle_20.12.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
I get that, and really I think Debian should target LTS with pretty much
everything. Unfortunately in my opinion KDE is kind of in a bad state right
now with regards to wayland. The newest versions offer a much better
experience for people want a modern desktop with better touch support, etc.
On 10/12/2020 18:12, Joe McEntire wrote:
> I don't know where this information is coming from, but 5.19.5 is in testing
> right now. Experimental has 5.20 and there's talk of getting 5.20.5 in time
> for the freeze, so we'll probably end up with some iteration of 5.20 in
> stable
> if I had to
Hi Joe,
I know KDE platform of Debian testing (Bullseye) version is ahead.
I was just talking about the past (Buster) and about that approach.
It's great the KDE platform is moving on the edge of the versions, but i
think we should consider freeze policy for Debian stable release.
Maybe it is
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:12:53PM -0500, Joe McEntire wrote:
>
> On Thursday, December 10, 2020 11:08:59 AM EST you wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 07:20:18PM +0330, peylight wrote:
> > > Hi Andy,
> > > You are talking about freeze timeline and policies.
> > > Please look at this document for
On Thursday, December 10, 2020 11:08:59 AM EST you wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 07:20:18PM +0330, peylight wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> > You are talking about freeze timeline and policies.
> > Please look at this document for that:
> > https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html
> > The
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:51:08 +0100
Source: elisa-player
Architecture: source
Version: 20.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By: Aurélien COUDERC
Changes:
elisa-player_20.12.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
elisa-player_20.12.0-1.dsc
elisa-player_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz
elisa-player_20.12.0.orig.tar.xz.asc
elisa-player_20.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz
elisa-player_20.12.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 07:20:18PM +0330, peylight wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> You are talking about freeze timeline and policies.
> Please look at this document for that:
> https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html
> The time and date is defined and any programmer can planning for it.
> I
Hi Andy,
You are talking about freeze timeline and policies.
Please look at this document for that:
https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html
The time and date is defined and any programmer can planning for it.
I check the LTS versions of KDE and what can i see Debian choose is
v5.14,
On Thursday, 10 December 2020 11:16:17 GMT peylight wrote:
> Hello Guys,
> Do you know why Debian is not using KDE Plasma LTS for Stable version?
> I mean for now DebianBuster is using Plasma 5.14.5, However KDE
> Community have no support for that version:
>
Hello Guys,
Do you know why Debian is not using KDE Plasma LTS for Stable version?
I mean for now DebianBuster is using Plasma 5.14.5, However KDE
Community have no support for that version:
https://community.kde.org/Schedules/Plasma_5
Why Debian don't choice KDE LTS version for Debian stable
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:34:30 +0100
with message-id <2790206.VdNmn5OnKV@thyrus>
and subject line Re: Bug#977024: marble-data and marble-qt-data are not m-a:
foreign which blocks cross-building
has caused the Debian Bug report #977024,
regarding marble-data and marble-qt-data are
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 977024 wishlist
Bug #977024 [marble-data] marble-data and marble-qt-data are not m-a: foreign
which blocks cross-building
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
25 matches
Mail list logo
