I agree that it would be a good idea to discuss this in a central location
where the
largest number of hunspell maintainers are likely to see the discussion and a
general consensus can be reached. As I don’t see a mailing list for either
Hunspell
or for dictionaries in general, I have filed a
@Agustin: context:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2022/09/msg00011.html ff.
Hi again,
Am 20.09.22 um 20:02 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 20.09.22 um 18:38 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
I did speak to the maintainer of the English hunspell packages (Don
Armstrong), which are based on the sc
Hi,
Am 20.09.22 um 18:38 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
I did speak to the maintainer of the English hunspell packages (Don
Armstrong), which are based on the scowl source package.
But not with the maintainer of the hunspell engine itself. Who wrote the
hunspell parts of
/usr/share/doc/dictionar
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 8:56:00 AM MST Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I'd argue for a separate package since this .bdic is QtWebengine
> specific isn't it? Nothing else uses it.
>
> Whereas the hunspell dicts as-is are used by various applications.
>
> > and if the proposed file locations and sym
Hi,
Am 18.09.22 um 00:32 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
I noticed that Debian does not currently ship packages for Qt
WebEngine dictionaries. Qt WebEngine can use Hunspell dictionaries
compiled into a special binary format using qwebengine_convert_dict
from the qtwebengine5-dev-tools package.
http
5 matches
Mail list logo
