Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:47:12 +
with message-id e1qg6lc-0001ow...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#545139: fixed in akonadi 1.3.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #545139,
regarding kmail: unusable with $HOME on OpenAFS due to Akonadi not starting
to be marked as done
not start/stop
Akonadi!
kmail(4842) main: Unable to start Akonadi server, exit application
The problem with starting Akonadi is that it tries to create a UNIX
socket in $HOME/.local/share/akonadi/db_misc/mysql.socket. This is not
possible with OpenAFS. See also the attached report.
I see
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@mathi.uni-heidelberg.de writes:
The problem with starting Akonadi is that it tries to create a UNIX
socket in $HOME/.local/share/akonadi/db_misc/mysql.socket. This is not
possible with OpenAFS. See also the attached report.
I forgot to attach the report, but after
Hello,
I was able to solve the No resource agents found problem!
just copy the agent directory from /usr/share/akonadi/ to /usr/local/share/
this works for me on mandriva 2009.1
Best regards
ph
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Akonadi-not-starting
Hi Kevin,
There is no support yet to map this directly into a single Akonadi
resource, however it is already possible to access maildir
(recursively IIRC) and mbox (coming with 4.3) through separate
resources.
Gotcha .. my paranoia running up a bit when I see references that
describe
On Wednesday 15 April 2009, jedd wrote:
Fairy nuff. My gut feel is that we'd be better off making people
run the MySQL database properly - just make it a dependency, and use
debconf stuff to set up the database per user. If we're committed to
having a MySQL instance to run Akonadi, then I
On Wednesday 15 April 2009, jedd wrote:
So if I don't make any changes at this end, 4.3 will, when it arrives,
just work with this mbox/maildir hybrid arrangement?
Short answer: yes.
Long answer: probably not in the way you think about it right now.
Full answer: KMail will still use its mail
On Wednesday 15 April 2009, Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Wednesday 15 April 2009, jedd wrote:
Fairy nuff. My gut feel is that we'd be better off making people
run the MySQL database properly - just make it a dependency, and use
debconf stuff to set up the database per user. If we're
On Wednesday 15 April 2009, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Think about Akonadi as a kind of proxy for PIM data. It makes access
fast, allows access to content currently not available directly but
the canonical source of content is still where it is without the
proxy.
It's hard to argue with a
Hi Kevin,
On that URL previously posted, there was a comment regarding the
problem (as yet unresolved) of handling mail systems that used a
combination of mbox and maildir. I gather maildir is the preferred way
these days - and on my desktop computer I used to use this all the
time as the
On Tuesday 14 April 2009, jedd wrote:
Hi Kevin,
On that URL previously posted, there was a comment regarding the
problem (as yet unresolved) of handling mail systems that used a
combination of mbox and maildir. I gather maildir is the preferred way
these days - and on my desktop
Hi.
I still have a mixed environment. I have most kdebase from 3.5, but I have
more installed apps from 4.2 than 3.5, and I'm migrating slowly. One of them
is KOrganizer, which runs and works, but it has problems starting Akonadi.
Each time I start KOrganizer, kres-migrator runs, and tries
a mixed environment. I have most kdebase from 3.5, but I have
more installed apps from 4.2 than 3.5, and I'm migrating slowly. One of
them is KOrganizer, which runs and works, but it has problems starting
Akonadi.
Each time I start KOrganizer, kres-migrator runs, and tries to start
Akonadi
El Lunes, 13 de Abril de 2009, jjl...@yahoo.fr escribió:
Maybe same problem here.
I don't understand how akonadi works, but I don't find any trace of it
anywhere except in /etc/akonadi (there is a mysql-global.conf)
I didn't see any akonadi process.
I even disabled mysql in initscript.
And
El Lunes, 13 de Abril de 2009, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
I still have a mixed environment. I have most kdebase from 3.5, but I have
more installed apps from 4.2 than 3.5, and I'm migrating slowly. One of
them is KOrganizer, which runs and works, but it has problems starting
Akonadi.
I don't
have most kdebase from 3.5, but I
have more installed apps from 4.2 than 3.5, and I'm migrating slowly. One
of them is KOrganizer, which runs and works, but it has problems starting
Akonadi.
I don't know what I have done (if anything), but now Akonadi starts
fine... :-?
I've even
On Monday 13 April 2009, jjl...@yahoo.fr wrote:
http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/PIM/Akonadi
...
It even explains that akonadi DB use 100M
by default, then grow ...
I noticed that somewhere, too .. 100MB *per user*, mind. Entirely
unsure how this will scale up for organisations who like to
On Monday 13 April 2009, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
Hi.
I still have a mixed environment. I have most kdebase from 3.5, but I have
more installed apps from 4.2 than 3.5, and I'm migrating slowly. One of
them is KOrganizer, which runs and works, but it has problems starting
Akonadi.
Each time I
On Monday 13 April 2009, jedd wrote:
On Monday 13 April 2009, jjl...@yahoo.fr wrote:
http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/PIM/Akonadi
...
It even explains that akonadi DB use 100M
by default, then grow ...
I noticed that somewhere, too .. 100MB *per user*, mind. Entirely
unsure how
El Lunes, 13 de Abril de 2009, jjl...@yahoo.fr escribió:
I find this page today :
http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/PIM/Akonadi
Maybe it's a known page but if not, it could help.
Yes, I knew the page, but thanks anyway.
For example it said that akonadi is actually used only by kpilot and
Since there is, with default configuration, one database per user, you are both
right.
Look at directory .local/share/akonadi/db_data/
141M here.
Not a problem for me since it's on my personnal computer.
But with a notebook or other small device (with small storage size) it could
be really
21 matches
Mail list logo
