Le jeudi 16 novembre 2017, 17:10:03 CET Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
> Martin Steigerwald - 15.11.17, 10:34:
> > Martin Steigerwald - 14.11.17, 10:55:
> > > anxious...@gmail.com - 26.10.17, 00:01:
> > > > I do recognise that the ftpmasters have a large workload and I am
> > > > merely
> > > > seeki
Martin Steigerwald - 15.11.17, 10:34:
> Martin Steigerwald - 14.11.17, 10:55:
> > anxious...@gmail.com - 26.10.17, 00:01:
> > > I do recognise that the ftpmasters have a large workload and I am merely
> > > seeking information rather than trying to be pushy.
> > >
> > > KDE Applications 17.08 seem
Martin Steigerwald - 14.11.17, 10:55:
> anxious...@gmail.com - 26.10.17, 00:01:
> > I do recognise that the ftpmasters have a large workload and I am merely
> > seeking information rather than trying to be pushy.
> >
> > KDE Applications 17.08 seem to have been waiting for approval for some
> > ti
anxious...@gmail.com - 26.10.17, 00:01:
> I do recognise that the ftpmasters have a large workload and I am merely
> seeking information rather than trying to be pushy.
>
> KDE Applications 17.08 seem to have been waiting for approval for some time.
> Are there issues which need to be sorted out,
Pino Toscano - 11.11.17, 11:49:
> In data sabato 11 novembre 2017 11:40:43 CET, Martin Steigerwald ha scritto:
> > Why are also packages with same name as before such as kmail, akregator
> > and so on in NEW queue?
>
> Because they are new *sources*. The NEW queue is not only for new
> binaries.
In data sabato 11 novembre 2017 11:40:43 CET, Martin Steigerwald ha scritto:
> Why are also packages with same name as before such as kmail, akregator and
> so
> on in NEW queue?
Because they are new *sources*. The NEW queue is not only for new
binaries.
--
Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Descrip
Sandro Knauß - 26.10.17, 12:58:
> On Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2017 00:01:52 CEST anxious...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I do recognise that the ftpmasters have a large workload and I am merely
> > seeking information rather than trying to be pushy.
> >
> > KDE Applications 17.08 seem to have been waiting
Martin Steigerwald - 30.10.17, 12:33:
> Akonadi 17.08 is avaiable in experimental meanwhile, KMail is still 16.04.
> Well… let´s see how running Akonadi 17.08 with KMail 16.04 will work :)
Okay, thanks for sabotaging my "I want to break my system by mixing different
versions" adventure. :)
But
Hi.
Sandro Knauß - 26.10.17, 12:58:
> On Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2017 00:01:52 CEST anxious...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I do recognise that the ftpmasters have a large workload and I am merely
> > seeking information rather than trying to be pushy.
> >
> > KDE Applications 17.08 seem to have been wai
Hey,
On Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2017 00:01:52 CEST anxious...@gmail.com wrote:
> I do recognise that the ftpmasters have a large workload and I am merely
> seeking information rather than trying to be pushy.
>
> KDE Applications 17.08 seem to have been waiting for approval for some time.
> Are th
I do recognise that the ftpmasters have a large workload and I am merely
seeking information rather than trying to be pushy.
KDE Applications 17.08 seem to have been waiting for approval for some time.
Are there issues which need to be sorted out, or is it just a big task to work
through them?
11 matches
Mail list logo