Re: Install KLyX

2001-10-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 12:41:47AM -0400, Bruce wrote: > Isn't KLyX esssentially dead? I would look at the Lyx homepage (www.lyx.org); > I seem to recall that Klyx is more or less abandoned, and you will get far > more mileage out of the current version of Lyx itself. From my reading of the semi

Re: Install KLyX

2001-10-19 Thread Bruce
Isn't KLyX esssentially dead? I would look at the Lyx homepage (www.lyx.org); I seem to recall that Klyx is more or less abandoned, and you will get far more mileage out of the current version of Lyx itself. Bruce

Re: Install KLyX

2001-10-15 Thread Bud Rogers
On Monday 15 October 2001 07:44 am, Ben Burton wrote: > > I want to install KLyX in my Potato box. Here's the result: > > The KLyX package you are trying to install was built for KDE 1.x, hence > your problems. I don't think there is a KDE 2.x package available, but

Re: Install KLyX

2001-10-15 Thread Ben Burton
> I want to install KLyX in my Potato box. Here's the result: The KLyX package you are trying to install was built for KDE 1.x, hence your problems. I don't think there is a KDE 2.x package available, but I could be wrong. Ben.

Install KLyX

2001-10-15 Thread Mark Rompies
Hi! I want to install KLyX in my Potato box. Here's the result: # dpkg -i klyx_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb (Reading database ... 73566 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace klyx 0.9.8a-1 (using klyx_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement klyx ... dpkg: dependency pro