On Tue 16 Jul 2002 18:34, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 16 July 2002 06:15 am, John Gay wrote:
> > Well, it seems the consensus is about a week?!? Being out of work at the
> > moment, I've got nothing but time. There have also been a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 July 2002 06:15 am, John Gay wrote:
> Well, it seems the consensus is about a week?!? Being out of work at the
> moment, I've got nothing but time. There have also been a few suggestions,
> which I'll give my answers to and maybe someone
Well, it seems the consensus is about a week?!? Being out of work at the
moment, I've got nothing but time. There have also been a few suggestions,
which I'll give my answers to and maybe someone can enlighten me in the
errors of my ways ;-)
This machine takes old RAM's which should be easy and
n Gay
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
debian-kde@lists.debian.org
om.net> cc:
Subject: Just how long does
måndagen den 15 juli 2002 21.34 skrev John Gay:
> So, my question is, just how long can I expect the rest of KDE3 to take to
> compile? Yes, I know I can now get unstable deb's, but I want to try it for
> myself. The tar balls are from around Jan this year.
I doubt you can do it in reasonable tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 15 July 2002 8:34 pm, John Gay wrote:
> So, my question is, just how long can I expect the rest of KDE3 to take to
> compile?
Ages. kdelibs and kdebase both take about the same amount of time to compile
as QT, so thats ages. Then you have t
I've been playing arould with Debain for several years now, but I've always
been aware of the delay between software release and Debian release,
especially when freeze is approching. I've been toying with the idea of
building my own custom box for a while, and since I have some spare hardware
a
7 matches
Mail list logo