On 21/04/13 00:04, Modestas Vainius wrote:
There is a way to do this - backports. It is an official service as of
wheezy.
However, I see the main problem here - noone is interested in actually doing
the necessary work and invest their days/weeks of time to make it reality.
Debian
Hello,
On Friday 19 April 2013 13:48:04 Julian wrote:
Its a high level application that runs on, what rightly should be, a
well tested lower (dependency) levels of a stable core (debian base).
So it has a lot to be thankful for when it comes to stability *out of
the box* or are you saying
Hello,
On 2013 m. of April 18 d., Thursday 04:04:01 Julian wrote:
release cycle rigmarole even if obsolete by the time it comes out of
freeze and is burned to 100's of blurays...no one wants 4.8 anymore.
You know there are many people who do not care (or does not know) about
version at all.
* Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org [18-04-2013 15:34 EEST]:
On 2013 m. of April 18 d., Thursday 04:04:01 Julian wrote:
release cycle rigmarole even if obsolete by the time it comes out of
freeze and is burned to 100's of blurays...no one wants 4.8 anymore.
People desperate for 4.10 are
On 18/04/13 22:32, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
On 2013 m. of April 18 d., Thursday 04:04:01 Julian wrote:
release cycle rigmarole even if obsolete by the time it comes out of
freeze and is burned to 100's of blurays...no one wants 4.8 anymore.
You know there are many people who do not
Hello!
Julian wrote:
Having a stable and tested operating system and its core packages is
important and packages end up in stable that have gone through the
rigmarole.
I fully agree!
Rolling releases of individual packages are everywhere (downloadable
.deb packages or little source repos),
On 18/04/13 02:46, Markus Raab wrote:
Hello!
Julian wrote:
Having a stable and tested operating system and its core packages is
important and packages end up in stable that have gone through the
rigmarole.
I fully agree!
Rolling releases of individual packages are everywhere
People desperate for 4.10 are installing experimental, which is crazy,
experimental is the crucible of package pain and will always be that
way, but it is unnecessary for alot of applications out there, including
KDE.
I'd rather test application bugs than package dependency bugs in
On 2013-04-07, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
Feel free to contact me privately. But note that that you need to have a
good personal backup strategy.
Based on various feedback from the nice volunteers including Diane,
Andreas, Martin, Marco, Edward and Michael, the package is now in
Hi
you are right, it's not upgrade from or to version in official debian, i
forgot that.
Just wanted to help with possible conflict, i didn't realise, that it won't
affect users, who use official packages
Libor
*On Friday 12 April 2013 14:48:17 Sune Vuorela wrote:*
* On 2013-04-12, Libor
Hello,
I have build kdepim 4.10.2 packages from git, everything looks fine (i was
building previous version of kdepim from git too, so no migration here)
there is one conflict, it shows during upgrade
--
Preparing to replace kleopatra 4:4.8.3-0r0 (using
.../kleopatra_4.10.2-0r4_amd64.deb)
On 2013-04-12, Libor Klepáč libor.kle...@bcom.cz wrote:
Hi
Preparing to replace kleopatra 4:4.8.3-0r0 (using
This is not a version we have been providing, so upgrading from it is on
your own.
.../kleopatra_4.10.2-0r4_amd64.deb) ...
This is also not a package we have been providin so
* Libor Klepáč libor.kle...@bcom.cz [12-04-2013 16:58 EEST]:
Hello,
I have build kdepim 4.10.2 packages from git, everything looks fine (i was
building previous version of kdepim from git too, so no migration here)
there is one conflict, it shows during upgrade
--
Preparing to replace
On 2013-04-06, Diederik de Haas didi.deb...@cknow.org wrote:
Sune said:
the 'normal' experimental is where the action happens, but it happens
currently dripwise and not as a big chunk, as it makes stuff easier for
the developers. It includes prepearation for the modern kdepim.
Is that the
Am Friday 05 April 2013 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
Actual upgrade issues, like file overlaps and such - you are most
welcome to report those. But remember your backup.
Hmm...I am hesitant to open a bug report here, because that seems so obvious
that I am almost sure that I miss something. Does
Hello,
On Friday 05 April 2013 08:42:54 Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-04-05, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
What was the reason for qt-kde.debian.net then? From the page:
Some people thinks experimental is hard. Other people dislike doing the
copyright-documentation that is
On Saturday April 06, 2013 12:07:57 Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
On Friday 05 April 2013 08:42:54 Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-04-05, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
What was the reason for qt-kde.debian.net then? From the page:
Some people thinks experimental is hard.
Hello,
On Saturday 06 April 2013 12:51:13 Beojan Stanislaus wrote:
I wish there was some Continuous integration for KDE packaging which
took
the load of:
* Package building and dependency management.
* Package uploading to development repository for testing.
* Automatted Lintian
Sune said:
the 'normal' experimental is where the action happens, but it happens
currently dripwise and not as a big chunk, as it makes stuff easier for
the developers. It includes prepearation for the modern kdepim.
Is that the reason that if I want to do a full-upgrade, the 'solution' to the
On 07/04/13 06:54, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Sune said:
the 'normal' experimental is where the action happens, but it happens
currently dripwise and not as a big chunk, as it makes stuff easier for
the developers. It includes prepearation for the modern kdepim.
Is that the reason that if I
On 04/04/13 21:54, David Baron wrote:
I agree. I have two (count 'em) experimental snapshot sets of KDE, the KDE4.9
on qt-kde.debian.net/debian and now the 4.10 on
packages.siduction.org/kdenext. This is certainly not desirable and
probably, the 4.10 shouild be copied or moved to the
On 2013-04-05, Julian temp...@internode.on.net wrote:
Were the servers down at qt-kde.debian.net? Sorry I'm just confused as
to why 4.10 isn't there?
pushing things to qt-kde.debian.net is quite some extra work for
everybody, for example it is not hooked up to debian autobuilder
infrastructure,
mailing list.
I continue looking forward to KDE SC 4.10 for Debian via official means.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On 2013-04-05, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
What was the reason for qt-kde.debian.net then? From the page:
Some people thinks experimental is hard. Other people dislike doing the
copyright-documentation that is required for the official archive. And
qt-kde.d.n also could allow
The upgrade fails on my system, each time with kde-runtime-data.
Details:
# aptitude safe-upgrade
Resolving dependencies...
The following packages will be upgraded:
kde-runtime-data
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
dolphin kate kde-baseapps
On Thursday 04 April 2013 08:21:39 Diederik de Haas wrote:
The upgrade fails on my system, each time with kde-runtime-data.
Please disregard my previous msg, since I was upgrading from the 'normal'
experimental.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Thursday, 04 April, 2013 02:08:00 AM José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il
Up and running, quite nicely
My wife's desktop came up, no problem.
Mine crashed plasma-desktop. Had to start over, new .kde.
Found problem was actually the yaWP weather
On 2013-04-04, Diederik de Haas didi.deb...@cknow.org wrote:
On Thursday 04 April 2013 08:21:39 Diederik de Haas wrote:
The upgrade fails on my system, each time with kde-runtime-data.
Please disregard my previous msg, since I was upgrading from the 'normal'
experimental.
the 'normal'
On Thursday, 04 April, 2013 09:32:04 AM David Baron wrote:
On Thursday, 04 April, 2013 02:08:00 AM José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il
Up and running, quite nicely
My wife's desktop came up, no problem.
Mine crashed plasma-desktop. Had to start
On 2013-04-04, David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
All siduction pakages upgraded today, saw -dev packages there as well.
Please take siduction support off this list.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
Hello Marin,
Hi José,
Hi!
I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems
José and others work on KDE SC 4.10.
Are any of these already in a testable state? I may be inclined to
build some during
On Thursday, 04 April, 2013 01:44:08 PM Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
Hello Marin,
Hi José,
Hi!
I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems
José and others work on KDE SC 4.10.
Are any
Up and running, quite nicely
My wife's desktop came up, no problem.
Mine crashed plasma-desktop. Had to start over, new .kde.
Found problem was actually the yaWP weather plasmoid. When I put that back,
crashed, so had to do some surgery on plasma-desktop-appletrc to get rid of
it.
--
To
David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il
Up and running, quite nicely
My wife's desktop came up, no problem.
Mine crashed plasma-desktop. Had to start over, new .kde.
Found problem was actually the yaWP weather plasmoid. When I put that back,
crashed, so had to do some surgery on
José Manuel Santamaría Lema panfa...@gmail.com
rebuilt against 4.8
ugh, I meant rebuilt against KDE workspaces 4.10.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello Marin,
Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de
Hi!
I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems
José and others work on KDE SC 4.10.
Are any of these already in a testable state? I may be inclined to build
some during the free week after the coming week
José Manuel Santamaría Lema panfa...@gmail.com
deb http://packages.siduction.org/kdenext experimental-snapshots
Oops, I actually meant:
deb http://packages.siduction.org/kdenext experimental-snapshots main
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi!
I have browsed some basic packages at git.debian.org and it seems
José and others work on KDE SC 4.10.
Are any of these already in a testable state? I may be inclined to build
some during the free week after the coming week.
Anyway, keep up the good work.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios
38 matches
Mail list logo
