Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-18 Thread Daniel Schepler
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I like the following combination of what's already been suggested: > > kde-core (arts, libs, base - for people not needing a full-blown KDE > environment); > kde (all of the official release excluding -dev and kdesdk, i.e., > the KDE for general us

Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-17 Thread Charles de Miramon
Le Lundi 17 Mars 2003 10:28, Ralf Nolden a écrit : > > You'll get that with apt-get install kdebase anyway :-) That's why I > proposed to make it a metapackage for kdebase and kdm. > There are in Debian : a x-system-core and a gnome-core. I would vote also for a kde-core so that the naming conven

Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-17 Thread Ben Burton
> You'll get that with apt-get install kdebase anyway :-) That's why I proposed > to make it a metapackage for kdebase and kdm. Ah, okay. Though I'd argue in this case just to get rid of kde-core completely. If you only want the bare bones of KDE support, it seems unlikely to me that you'd cho

Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:11:57AM -0700, Ben Burton scrawled: > Hmm, on retrospect the kde-extras idea seems questionable to me - it will > take a lot of effort to keep it current and to ensure that all the apps > it depends on are in good working order. Yeah, I personally think kde-extras is far

Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-17 Thread Ralf Nolden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 17 March 2003 10:01, Ben Burton wrote: > I like the following combination of what's already been suggested: > > kde-core (arts, libs, base - for people not needing a full-blown KDE > environment); You'll get that with apt-get install kde

Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-17 Thread Ben Burton
Hmm, on retrospect the kde-extras idea seems questionable to me - it will take a lot of effort to keep it current and to ensure that all the apps it depends on are in good working order. Though I'd still like to see kdbg, kprof and kcachegrind in the -devel metapackage if it will be made, for rea

Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-17 Thread Ben Burton
I like the following combination of what's already been suggested: kde-core (arts, libs, base - for people not needing a full-blown KDE environment); kde (all of the official release excluding -dev and kdesdk, i.e., the KDE for general users); kde-devel (-dev, kdesdk, other devel stuff li

Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-17 Thread Ralf Nolden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 17 March 2003 02:46, Chris Cheney wrote: > I am now open for suggestions on how to organize the new kde > meta-package(s). I was thinking about possibly having one that depended > on arts, kdelibs, kdebase (possibly kde-core?) then another de

Re: KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-16 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 07:46:45PM -0600, Chris Cheney scrawled: > I am now open for suggestions on how to organize the new kde > meta-package(s). I was thinking about possibly having one that depended > on arts, kdelibs, kdebase (possibly kde-core?) then another depending on > all official kde pac

KDE meta-package suggestions

2003-03-16 Thread Chris Cheney
I am now open for suggestions on how to organize the new kde meta-package(s). I was thinking about possibly having one that depended on arts, kdelibs, kdebase (possibly kde-core?) then another depending on all official kde packages (possibly kde), but I have not decided on this yet. I could also a