On Monday 16 December 2002 08:53 pm, Doug Holland wrote:
> Apparently, Karolina's KDE3.1RC5 packages came with its own version of SDL,
> which conflicted with Sid's SDL packages and removed them. Unfortunately,
> there is no libsdl-dev package that has the SDL headers, so my development
> work, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 18 Dec 2002 23:00, Doug Holland wrote:
> /me pines for a Debian equivalent of "rpm --nodeps --force"...
dpkg -i --force-conflicts --force-depends
BUT very bad idea.
man dpkg && dpkg --help && dpkg --force-help
Regards,
Paul Cupis
-
On Tuesday 17 December 2002 01:12 am, Alexander Opitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> play a littlte bit around :-)
>
> It works (for me) with package:
> + libsdl1.2debian-all+arts1.1 (Version 1.2.4-1+arts1.1-1)
> + libsdl1.2debian (Version 1.2.4-1+arts1.1-1)
> + libsdl1.2-dev
On Tuesday 17 December 2002 01:13 am, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> tisdagen den 17 december 2002 04.53 skrev Doug Holland:
> > Apparently, Karolina's KDE3.1RC5 packages came with its own version of
> > SDL, which conflicted with Sid's SDL packages and removed them.
> > Unfortunately, there is no li
tisdagen den 17 december 2002 04.53 skrev Doug Holland:
> Apparently, Karolina's KDE3.1RC5 packages came with its own version of SDL,
> which conflicted with Sid's SDL packages and removed them. Unfortunately,
> there is no libsdl-dev package that has the SDL headers, so my development
> work, whi
Hi,
play a littlte bit around :-)
It works (for me) with package:
+ libsdl1.2debian-all+arts1.1 (Version 1.2.4-1+arts1.1-1)
+ libsdl1.2debian (Version 1.2.4-1+arts1.1-1)
+ libsdl1.2-dev (Version 1.2.4-1)
all are in unstable.
Have Fun
Am Dienstag, 17. Deze
Apparently, Karolina's KDE3.1RC5 packages came with its own version of SDL,
which conflicted with Sid's SDL packages and removed them. Unfortunately,
there is no libsdl-dev package that has the SDL headers, so my development
work, which requires SDL has ground to a halt.
Are there any easy wor
7 matches
Mail list logo
