Re: Koffice progress on C++ ABI transision

2005-09-27 Thread Adeodato Simó
* David Goodenough [Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:28:56 +0100]: > This may well be the case, but it still does not answer the question as to > where the official packages are. Maybe the time has now come to say > that the original request not to put in bugs against packages which have > not been updated is

Re: Koffice progress on C++ ABI transision

2005-09-27 Thread David Goodenough
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 00:51, Matej Cepl wrote: > Alan Chandler wrote: > > Anybody any idea what is holding up the koffice transision. I have my > > updated KDE for a few weeks now, but I am still without kword (and > > others). Occassional messages to this list all have replies that express

Re: Koffice progress on C++ ABI transision

2005-09-26 Thread Matej Cepl
Alan Chandler wrote: > Anybody any idea what is holding up the koffice transision. I have my > updated KDE for a few weeks now, but I am still without kword (and > others). Occassional messages to this list all have replies that express > optimism for an answer that is now at least two weeks old.

Koffice progress on C++ ABI transision

2005-09-26 Thread Alan Chandler
Anybody any idea what is holding up the koffice transision. I have my updated KDE for a few weeks now, but I am still without kword (and others). Occassional messages to this list all have replies that express optimism for an answer that is now at least two weeks old. Anyone any idea where I c