Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-11-02 Thread Michael Hoodes
> fredagen den 1 november 2002 21.19 skrev Michael Hoodes: >> I don't know if that is the solution to the Konqueror pause problem . >> and there are people with IPV6 who would not be too happy if it was >> turned off! Is it possible to make IPV6 a setting option in >> Konqueror? On Sat, 2 N

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-11-02 Thread Karolina Lindqvist
fredagen den 1 november 2002 21.19 skrev Michael Hoodes: > I don't know if that is the solution to the Konqueror pause problem and > there are people with IPV6 who would not be too happy if it was turned > off! Is it possible to make IPV6 a setting option in Konqueror? Actually, KDE has three mo

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-11-01 Thread Michael Hoodes
onsdagen den 30 oktober 2002 23.09 skrev Michael Hoodes: > I am using the karolina debs and kdelibs have been split up. I don't > know where to find the source and what "split" contains the IPV6 > call. I have a relatively slow machine and generally don't compile > KDE for that reason. O

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-11-01 Thread Michael Hoodes
I'll accept that the Konqueror pauses are doubleclick.net and sure we could try to deny it (Nathaniel and UDO on the 31st in this list) with dns or /etc/hosts but the fact remains that both Netscape and Opera deal with the doubleclick response without waiting for it. I don't know if Konqueror can

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-11-01 Thread Karolina Lindqvist
onsdagen den 30 oktober 2002 23.09 skrev Michael Hoodes: > I am using the karolina debs and kdelibs have been split up. I don't > know where to find the source and what "split" contains the IPV6 > call. I have a relatively slow machine and generally don't compile KDE > for that reason. I alread

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-31 Thread Udo Burghardt
Am Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2002 20:48 schrieb Nathaniel W. Turner: > The best workaround I've come up with is to put: > -8<- > zone "doubleclick.net" { > type master; Poor mans (without bind) solution from www.smartin-designs.com/hosts_info.htm: | # Doubleclick (Netgravity) | | 1

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-31 Thread Nathaniel W. Turner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 31 October 2002 02:17 pm, Todd Charron wrote: > do you know for sure what part of it is causing the problem? I'm now quite sure that it's doubleclick.net's DNS servers. A "traceroute6 www.google.com" fails right away, but "traceroute6 ad

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-31 Thread Todd Charron
I would say that it's a fairly serious problem. People who regularly browse to these sites (and they seem to be very popular ones) aren't going to use konqueror if they can bring it up much quicker in another browser... do you know for sure what part of it is causing the problem? Todd On Thu, 2

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-31 Thread Nathaniel W. Turner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I made a simple testcase for this "bug" at http://www.houseofnate.net/~nturner/slowloadingkonq/testcase3.html It seems a certain bit of markup commonly used to insert banner ads triggers this behavior. Whatever the cause (buggy dns servers or otherw

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Hoodes
On Thursday 31 October 2002 at 12:38 am, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:09:57PM -0800, Michael Hoodes scrawled: > > Let's hope official KDE 3.1 will fix the problem. Is there any > > way I can be insured of that? > > > > What confuses me, is how can KDE make an IPV6 call when I

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-31 Thread Joseph Fannin
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:38:17PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:09:57PM -0800, Michael Hoodes scrawled: > > Let's hope official KDE 3.1 will fix the problem. Is there any way I > > can be insured of that? > > > > What confuses me, is how can KDE make an IPV6 call wh

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-31 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:09:57PM -0800, Michael Hoodes scrawled: > Let's hope official KDE 3.1 will fix the problem. Is there any way I > can be insured of that? > > What confuses me, is how can KDE make an IPV6 call when I specifically > compiled my kernel without IPV6? Sounds like a

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-31 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:18AM -0500, Todd Charron scrawled: > I'm afraid I don't have an answer for you, but I too experience sluggish > browsing on certain sites. Most noticably with www.tsn.ca and > www.nhl.com (check out the left panel on that page, it's hideous!). I > have no idea what c

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-30 Thread Michael Hoodes
Roy and Todd, Thanks to the posting by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> it appears that our problem (NY Times, UK Register and NHL) is due to an erroneous IPV6 call that is rejected and/or times out. It is also recommended to recompile kdelibs with IPV6 set to no. It makes a lot of sense, earlier in thi

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-30 Thread Roy Bixler
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:27:46AM -0800, Michael Hoodes wrote: > Subject: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2 > > I have been using Konqueror for browsing the NY Times for as long as > it's been possible from early versions of KDE (1.x?, 2.x) and recently >

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-30 Thread BÃrre Gaup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 30 October 2002 17.50, Todd Charron wrote: It could be the issue with ipv6. It's been mentioned a few weeks ago in this list. The answer is to compile kdelibs without support for ipv6. This is lifted from a posting by Felix Homann <[EM

Re: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-30 Thread Todd Charron
it'd be fixed in 3.1... Todd On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 11:27, Michael Hoodes wrote: > Subject: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2 > > I have been using Konqueror for browsing the NY Times for as long as > it's been possible from early versions of KDE (1.x?, 2.x) and

Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2

2002-10-30 Thread Michael Hoodes
Subject: Konqueror and NY Times sluggish KDE 3.0 to 3.1 Beta 2 I have been using Konqueror for browsing the NY Times for as long as it's been possible from early versions of KDE (1.x?, 2.x) and recently (since 3.0 and now 3.1 Beta 2). I have noticed sluggish behavior that occurs consist