On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:53 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but comfortably
> above the minimum.
>
> Has anyone any experience of how well or badly this actually runs?
>
> TIA
> Lisi
>
I run a Lenny machine with 256MB in an office env
Am Dienstag 19 Mai 2009 schrieb Lisi Reisz:
> This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but
> comfortably above the minimum.
KDE 3.4 from Etch ran flawless with kmail and iceweasel with 256 MB RAM.
HTH Martin
--
http://www.bretschneidernet.de/OpenPGP-key: 0x4EA52583
On Mar 19 May 2009 05:53:48 Lisi Reisz escribió:
> This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but
> comfortably above the minimum.
No, I had a 512 MB system for years and worked flawlessly. indeed, when I
switched to 1 GB, I couldn't notice it during normal use (not compiling,
On Tue May 19 2009 01:53:48 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but
> comfortably above the minimum.
>
> Has anyone any experience of how well or badly this actually runs?
My backup laptop is an old Thinkpad with a P2/366 and 256MB RAM.
It runs the sa
This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but comfortably
above the minimum.
Has anyone any experience of how well or badly this actually runs?
TIA
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
5 matches
Mail list logo